Premium
This is an archive article published on February 5, 2014

DMK memo says SPP colluding with accused in Jaya case

DMK allegations had led to hasty removal of the SPP by the Karnataka government but Bhawani Singh was re-instated after the AIADMK approached the Supreme Court.

A senior DMK leader filed a memo in a special court here Tuesday against the special public prosecutor (SPP) in the Rs 66.65-crore disproportionate assets case against J Jayalalithaa and the department of vigilance of the Tamil Nadu government for allegedly colluding with the Chief Minister to delay trial.

K Anbazhagan filed the memo after SPP Bhawani Singh, at the instance of the Tamil Nadu directorate of vigilance, filed an application in the court Monday seeking production of additional silverware weighing 1,061 kg seized in 1997 from Jayalalithaa but handed over to her then personal secretary V Baskaran for safekeeping.

The memo said it was an effort to delay the trial in collusion with the accused since the prosecution had in August last year ignored these material objects and instead sought to conclude arguments. Anbazhagan also pointed out that the SPP had sought to summon Baskaran despite knowing that he died in December last year.

Story continues below this ad

“The petitioner superintendent of the DVAC in collusion with the accused has filed the application to help the accused person,’’ the memo says.

This is the second time the DMK has accused the prosecution of colluding with the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister in the course of the trial against her. Last August, before a different presiding officer, the party had levelled the same allegation after Bhawani Singh allowed the defence to place its arguments in the case without the prosecution presenting its case. It had then also accused the presiding officer of colluding with the accused.

The DMK allegations had led to hasty removal of the SPP by the Karnataka government but Bhawani Singh was re-instated after the AIADMK approached the Supreme Court.

Though the Supreme Court also ordered that the state government extend the term of the previous presiding officer to enable conclusion of the trial, he refused extension following the allegations brought against him. The case is now before a new judge, John Michael Cunha.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement