Premium
This is an archive article published on February 7, 2016

Sudhir Tailang (1960-2016): A structured cartoonist who made bold switches

It wasn’t easy to meet Sudhir Tailang socially on a working day. He took his time, some 10 hours he said, before he turned in the day’s drawing by 7 pm.

Sudhir Tailang 1960-2016 Sudhir Tailang (1960-2016)

Professional cartoonists are creatures of habit. Forever in the flux of news, we cling to just about anything that is familiar. Sudhir was no exception. He is rumoured to have gone back to an earlier job because he felt attached to the old office cabin. His workspace looked well lived in. It wasn’t easy to meet him socially on a working day. He took his time, some 10 hours he said, before he turned in the day’s drawing by 7 pm.

The man who structured his work so religiously did make some surprising switches. First from Hindi in Navbharat Times to English in Hindustan Times. The news cartoon is so rooted in the reader’s language that this is quite an ecological leap. Sudhir settled down soon enough and wrote captions that sounded no less English. No less universal either. There was a particularly witty one on global summitry: “G7+G15=Catch 22”.

More significant was his next shift from pocket cartoon, which was what he was doing six days a week in Hindustan Times and briefly with The Indian Express, before he moved to editorial cartoons for Asian Age, again every weekday. Sudhir was in full flow in his display cartoons. The generous editorial space was where his characteristic stylisation played out. Firm brush strokes tweaked facial features and anatomy to make public personalities as ethnically and politically diverse as P V Narasimha Rao, Manmohan Singh, Mamata Banerjee, J Jayalalithaa and L K Advani (an admirer) look straight out of Rajasthani folk art.

[related-post]

This Bikaner-born, who went at 55, was the most stylised Indian cartoonist of the generation that succeeded the veterans — Abu Abraham, O V Vijayan and Rajinder Puri. Like them, Sudhir stuck to black-and-white and brush-and-ink. He did turn to technology, but to draw as generously as he felt like — scanned in parts and stitched the images — and in short used the software to leave his drawing alone. The residual effect was stunningly individualistic. Of my peers, he needed the least to sign.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement