‘Show us the numbers’: Centre’s tribal ministry asks states to explain forest dwellers’ evictions from tiger reserves
The Ministry has asked the state tribal development and forest departments for a report detailing the name and number of villages situated in tiger reserves.
The issue came under spotlight last June when the National Tiger Conservation Authority asked state forest departments for a timeline for the relocation of 591 villages in tiger reserves.
Advertisement
Underlining that forest-dwelling communities were protected from unlawful eviction under the Forest Protection Act, the Ministry of Tribal Affairs has directed the states to create an institutional mechanism to ensure compliance with the law and set up a mechanism to address grievances, it is learnt.
The Ministry’s letter dated January 10 follows complaints it received over the last few months from dozens of villages situated inside tiger reserves in at least three states — MP, Maharashtra and West Bengal — alleging residents were being pressured to vacate their traditional lands without due recognition of their rights under the FRA and Wildlife Protection Act.
You have exhausted your monthly limit of free stories.
Read more stories for free with an Express account.
The Ministry has asked the state tribal development and forest departments for a report detailing the name and number of villages situated in tiger reserves; the tribes and forest-dwelling communities in such villages; and all the forest rights claims received, vested, and rejected. It has also sought to know the process of seeking consent and the likely compensation.
“The provisions under FRA explicitly empower forest-dwelling communities by legally recognising their rights, protecting them from unlawful eviction, and ensuring that any resettlement is carried out with their informed consent and participation,” the Ministry is learnt to have said.
The Ministry said that Section 4(2) of the FRA provides safeguards that make it imperative to obtain free, informed consent of gram sabhas in writing for relocation. The law also provides for settlement rights in the areas where the settlement is proposed, it is learnt to have said.
Explained
Row over relocation
In June, the NTCA wrote to the states seeking a timeline for the relocation of 591 villages situated inside tiger reserves. Rights groups criticised the move, saying relocation was voluntary.
The issue came under spotlight last June when the National Tiger Conservation Authority asked state forest departments for a timeline for the relocation of 591 villages in tiger reserves.
Story continues below this ad
When contacted, Gobind Sagar Bharadwaj, Additional Director of Forests (Project Tiger) and Member Secretary, NTCA, said, “Whenever NTCA receives any communication on allegations of evictions, it is referred to concerned states for action… NTCA’s stand on voluntary relocation of villages is that states have been directed to act in consonance with the existing laws.”
An award-winning journalist with 14 years of experience, Nikhil Ghanekar is an Assistant Editor with the National Bureau [Government] of The Indian Express in New Delhi. He primarily covers environmental policy matters which involve tracking key decisions and inner workings of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. He also covers the functioning of the National Green Tribunal and writes on the impact of environmental policies on wildlife conservation, forestry issues and climate change.
Nikhil joined The Indian Express in 2024. Originally from Mumbai, he has worked in publications such as Tehelka, Hindustan Times, DNA Newspaper, News18 and Indiaspend. In the past 14 years, he has written on a range of subjects such as sports, current affairs, civic issues, city centric environment news, central government policies and politics. ... Read More