Premium
This is an archive article published on February 10, 2022

As govt sits on collegium proposal, lawyer withdraws nod to be judge

Conventionally, the government is bound to accept the collegium’s recommendation if the decision has been reiterated.

A division Bench of Justice Sadhana S Jadhav and Justice Prithviraj K Chavan on February 8 passed a verdict in an appeal by the two.A division Bench of Justice Sadhana S Jadhav and Justice Prithviraj K Chavan on February 8 passed a verdict in an appeal by the two.

As the government continues to sit on recommendations made by the Supreme Court collegium — on three occasions —Bengaluru-based senior advocate Aditya Sondhi has withdrawn his consent for being appointed a judge of Karnataka High Court.

“It has been a year since the SC collegium first recommended my name, and over five months since it was last reiterated. So, as a matter of principle, I withdrew my consent for the process,” Sondhi told The Indian Express.

It is learnt that Sondhi has written to Chief Justice of India N V Ramana, who heads the Supreme Court collegium, withdrawing his consent.

Story continues below this ad

Sondhi, a graduate of National Law School of India University, in Bengaluru, was the Additional Advocate General under the Congress-led Karnataka government in 2016.

He was first recommended by the collegium on February 4 last year; his name was reiterated on August 24, 2021. The second reiteration was made on September 1, 2021.

Along with Sondhi, the recommendation of advocate Nagendra Ramachandra Naik is also pending, despite reiteration by the collegium. Naik, a senior advocate originally from Bhatkal in Karnataka, was a CBI counsel appointed by the UPA government at the Centre. The collegium first recommended him on October 3, 2019, along with eight other advocates. While the government appointed seven from the list, Naik’s recommendation is still pending.

The collegium then reiterated its recommendation on March 2, 2021 and again on September 1, 2021.

Story continues below this ad

Conventionally, the government is bound to accept the collegium’s recommendation if the decision has been reiterated.

While the MoP does not specifically talk about reiteration of the collegium recommendations, it says that “the Union Minister of Law, Justice and Company Affairs, would then put up as early as possible, preferably, within 3 weeks, the recommendation or the Chief Justice of India to the Prime Minister who will advise the President in the matter of appointment.”

The 1998 ruling, popularly referred to as the Third Judges case, held that the court will have the final say in judicial appointments.

Apurva Vishwanath is the National Legal Editor of The Indian Express in New Delhi. She graduated with a B.A., LL. B (Hons) from Dr Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow. She joined the newspaper in 2019 and in her current role, oversees the newspapers coverage of legal issues. She also closely tracks judicial appointments. Prior to her role at the Indian Express, she has worked with ThePrint and Mint. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement