This is an archive article published on September 26, 2023
Agamic Tamil Nadu temples: SC orders status quo for appointment of priests
The petitioner association pointed out that “prominent Shaivite and Vaishnavite temples in Tamil Nadu were built according to Agamas and worship therein is as per Agamas”.
New Delhi | Updated: September 26, 2023 09:33 AM IST
3 min read
Whatsapp
twitter
Facebook
Reddit
The plea contended that despite rulings by SC and Madras HC, the state government “in scant regard for law, are now attempting to appoint non-believers as archakas, only with a view to destroy temples in the state.
Listen to this article
Agamic Tamil Nadu temples: SC orders status quo for appointment of priests
x
00:00
1x1.5x1.8x
The Supreme Court on Monday ordered status quo regarding appointment of archakas (priests) in Tamil Nadu temples governed by the Agamic tradition.
Issuing notice on a writ petition by ‘Srirangam Koil Miras Kainkaryaparagal Matrum Athanai Sarntha Koilgalin Miraskain-karyaparargalin Nalasangam’ – as association of archakas, a bench of Justices AS Bopanna said “in the meantime, the status quo relating to archakaship in Agamic temples in question, shall be continued in the same manner, until further orders…”
The plea filed through advocate G Balaji and P Valliappan urged the court to quash the TN Government order dated July 27– 2023, and the Government letter of August 28–2023, and all consequential orders by which the state attempted to interfere with the hereditary scheme of appointing archakas of a particular denomination in Agama temples by throwing it open to those from other denominations, too, who had done a one-year certificate course for archakas in schools run by the government.
Story continues below this ad
The petitioner association pointed out that “prominent Shaivite and Vaishnavite temples in Tamil Nadu were built according to Agamas and worship therein is as per Agamas”.
The plea contended that despite rulings by SC and Madras HC, the state government “in scant regard for law, are now attempting to appoint non-believers as archakas, only with a view to destroy temples in the state. It is well settled that a secular Government does not have the power to interfere with essential religious practices, as such a right is well protected under the Constitution of India. Agamas undoubtedly pertains to an essential religious practice, which cannot be tampered with by a secular Government”.
It added that experience in Agamas is not secured by one year certificate courses but by years of rigorous training under learned Gurus. “…they obtain Deekshai or Samskara (initiation) from their Guru/Acharya, who is most often their respective fathers, at a very early age viz. between five and seven years and undergo rigorous Vedic education for a minimum period of three years. Thereafter, they are groomed to perform Poojas and Homams for another three to five years before taking over as Archakas”, it pointed out.
Appearing for the petitioner association, Senior Advocate Guru Krishna Kumar submitted that the Supreme Court had held in the 1972 case Seshammal and Others vs State of Tamil Nadu and the 2016 case Adi Saiva Sivachariyargal Nala Sangam v Government of Tamil Nadu that the Archakas of Agama temples have to be appointed as per Agama traditions.
Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry.
He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More