Premium

Man acquitted 39 years after Customs department booked him in 137kg drug seizure case

The case dates back to May 7, 1986, when the Customs department claimed to have received information about a huge quantity of drugs stored in a home in Worli

worliThe former Superintendent, who deposed as a witness, was not a part of the raiding team and the court observed that there was no record of who the officer was who had received the information about the drugs

A special court on Friday acquitted a 61-year-old man, over 39 years after the Customs department booked him in a drugs case, alleging that 137 kg of a contraband was found at his home in Worli.

Abdul Rauf Abdul Gafoor was acquitted of all charges under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. He was absconding for a long time and the trial was at a standstill till he returned in 2022. The case dates back to May 7, 1986, when the Customs department claimed to have received information about a huge quantity of drugs stored in a home in Worli. It had claimed that a search revealed seven cardboard boxes in the house containing different shaped objects which were later identified to be charas (marijuana).

The Customs department booked Gafoor and one Abdul Latif, who allegedly kept the drugs at the former’s home and and is still on the run. In 1986, the seized charas was valued at Rs 5.48 lakh. During the trial, the complainant remained untraceable, one officer was reported to have passed away and two others remained unavailable, despite non-bailable warrants against them. The former Superintendent, who deposed as a witness, was not a part of the raiding team and the court observed that there was no record of who the officer was who had received the information about the drugs. As the witness was not a part of the raiding team, the court said the search and seizure also was not proved. The chemical analyser’s report—a crucial evidence in the drugs cases—was also not part of the record. The seized drugs were destroyed in an incinerator in 1988.

“However, no sample was produced before the court, and the case records are reportedly untraceable at the NCH Laboratory. Consequently, the prosecution has failed to produce any sample before the court to substantiate the alleged recovery,” said Special Judge S M Bukke.

“Crucially, the prosecution has failed to examine material witnesses, including the carrier, storekeeper, chemical analyst, investigating officer, and the complainant. As a result, the prosecution has not established the chain of custody of the seized substance. In the absence of such proof, the possibility of tampering with the contraband cannot be ruled out,” the court said.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement