Premium
This is an archive article published on February 24, 2024

Jarange-Patil assures HC of peaceful protests from today for Maratha quota

This came after Advocate General Birendra Saraf representing the Maharashtra government submitted that Jarange-Patil has given a call for further agitation and has threatened to block roads in the state, thereby creating a problem with law and order and to the public peace at large.

Maratha quota protest, Jarange Patil protest call, Maratha quota activist Manoj Jarange-Patil, Bombay High Court, jalna protest, Jarange Patil health condition, indian express newsThe bench noted that Article 19(1)(b) of the Constitution gives a right to citizens to assemble peacefully and without arms and Article 19(1)(d) of the Constitution provides, to move freely throughout the territory of India (File Photo)

The lawyer representing Maratha quota activist Manoj Jarange-Patil on Friday assured the Bombay High Court that the agitation and protests will be held from Saturday across Maharashtra through peaceful means.

This came after Advocate General Birendra Saraf representing the Maharashtra government submitted that Jarange-Patil has given a call for further agitation and has threatened to block roads in the state, thereby creating a problem with law and order and to the public peace at large.

A division bench of Justice Ajey S Gadkari and Justice Shyam C Chandak was hearing two pleas including one by lawyer Gunratan Sadavarte against Jarange-Patil’s protests for Kunbi (OBC) status for Marathas.

Story continues below this ad

The HC on February 15 had permitted the civil surgeon of Jalna and his team of doctors to check the health of Jarange Patil, on an indefinite hunger strike, “on priority basis”. Sadavarte argued that Jarange-Patil has again given a call for further agitation and it may hamper the even tempo of life in the state.

He added that the Supreme Court in its 2020 Shaheen Bagh case judgment had observed that such kind of occupation of public ways, whether at the site in question or anywhere else for protests is not acceptable and the administration ought to take action to keep the areas clear of encroachments or obstructions.

Advocate V M Thorat for Jarange-Patil submitted that the call has been given by Maratha Andolan Samiti, of which his client is a member and not by any individual in his/her personal capacity. Thorat, on instructions, further submitted that the said agitation will be a peaceful agitation in all respects.

The bench noted that Article 19(1)(b) of the Constitution gives a right to citizens to assemble peacefully and without arms and Article 19(1)(d) of the Constitution provides, to move freely throughout the territory of India. However, it noted the said fundamental rights are with reasonable restriction.

Story continues below this ad

“It is for the state to impose reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right/rights conferred by the said clauses in the interest of the general public or for the protection of the interest of it,” the bench noted in its order. After Thorat sought time to take further instructions in the matter from his client, the HC posted the hearing to February 26.

Even as Maharashtra Assembly on February 20 unanimously passed a Bill to set aside 10% reservation for the Marathas under socially and educationally backward categories in jobs and education, Jarange-Patil has demanded that Marathas should be included in OBC category by granting them through Kunbi certificates

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement