February 21, 2020 3:27 am
Leader of Opposition in the state Legislative Council, Praveen Darekar, demanded that 3,500 Maratha candidates be appointed in government services.
February 20, 2020 2:38 am
The Supreme Court Collegium, through a statement issued on February 12, recommended the transfer of Justice Ranjit V More to the Meghalaya High Court.
July 15, 2019 9:36 am
At a meeting held in Mumbai, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis also said that the decrease in medical seats in open category due to reservation for various social communities in the state will be compensated by increasing the number of seats.
July 13, 2019 9:14 am
The Devendra Fadnavis government had been hoping to absorb those Maratha candidates into service whose applications had been stuck after the Bombay High Court on November 14, 2014 stayed the 16 per cent quota that then Congress-NCP government had granted to the community through an ordinance issued on July 9, 2014..
July 13, 2019 9:19 am
In Mumbai, GAD Secretary Shivaji Daund said: “Today’s statement by the SC will not have any bearing on the GR (government resolution) that was issued yesterday.
July 12, 2019 10:55 pm
The government said it would complete the process of quota for Marathas, which had remained incomplete after the high court stayed it in 2014.
July 12, 2019 12:55 pm
Earlier, while justifying giving the quota a retrsopective effect, the Devendra Fadnavis led state government argued that the ordinance granting 16 per cent reservation to the Marathas had originally been issued on July 9, 2014 by the previous Congress-NCP regime.
July 12, 2019 9:04 am
From lifting 271 million out of poverty in 10 years to the resignation of 16 Karnataka Congress-JD(S) MLAs, here's what's making news on Friday morning.
July 08, 2019 12:29 pm
The petition states that the High Court misread the limitation set by the SC in the Indra Sawhney and Nagaraj cases and concluded that no stringent ceiling limit of 50 per cent reservations has been prescribed by the apex court.
July 06, 2019 11:04 am
The petition states that the HC misread the limitation set by the SC in the Indra Sawhney and Nagaraj cases and concluded that no stringent ceiling limit of 50 per cent reservations has been prescribed by the apex court.