Premium
This is an archive article published on June 8, 2021

Bombay HC cancels ‘fraudulent’ SC certificate of MP Navneet Kaur-Rana

The court asked Kaur-Rana to surrender the certificate and directed her to pay a cost of Rs 2 lakh to the Maharashtra Legal Services Authority within two weeks.

MP from Amravati constituency and Telegu actress Navneet Kaur Rana. (File/Express Photo by Renuka Puri)MP from Amravati constituency and Telegu actress Navneet Kaur Rana. (File/Express Photo by Renuka Puri)

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday cancelled and confiscated the “wrong caste certificate” obtained by Amravati MP Navneet Kaur-Rana in 2013, which was validated by Caste Scrutiny Committee in 2017, and said that such an act may “deprive genuine and deserving persons from benefits prescribed in the law.”

The court asked Kaur-Rana to surrender the certificate to the Committee within six weeks and directed her to pay a cost of Rs 2 lakh to the Maharashtra Legal Services Authority within two weeks, adding that “all the consequences in law provided upon cancellation of such a fraudulently obtained certificate shall follow.”

The court also pulled up the District Caste Scrutiny Committee, Mumbai, which validated the certificate in November 2017, saying it “did its job rather sloppily and shirked the obligations imposed on it”.

With the order, the Member of Parliament, who got elected in the 2019 general elections as an independent candidate, may have to lose the seat which was reserved for a candidate from a Scheduled Caste.

A first-time independent Parliamentarian, Rana, 35, had won the 2019 Lok Sabha elections after the Congress-NCP combine decided to extend support to her, leading to her defeating then sitting MP, Shiv Sena’s Anandrao Adsul. But since the 2019 elections, Rana was said to be increasingly gravitating towards the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

A division bench of Justice RD Dhanuka and Justice VG Bisht on Tuesday passed the judgment on pleas filed by Adsul, along with Raju Mankar, a social worker from Amravati, challenging the order passed by the Committee validating the SC certificate of Kaur-Rana.

Adsul also prayed for quashing and setting aside the caste certificate issued by Deputy Collector, Mumbai in favour of Kaur-Rana on August 8, 2013, identifying Rana as belonging to the “Mochi” caste.

Story continues below this ad

Senior advocate CM Korde, representing Adsul, said that Kaur-Rana, with an intention to contest the parliamentary election in 2014 only, had asked her father to create records that could be used by her for obtaining the caste validity certificate. Senior Counsel Prasad K Dhakephalkar, for the respondent MP, opposed the pleas.

The HC noted that the claim of belonging to the “Mochi” caste made by Kaur-Rana was fraudulent and observed that “two sets of documents” produced by the MP before the Scrutiny Committee were “contradictory to each other”, adding that such “wrong caste certificate” may deprive genuine and deserving persons of their due benefits.

“In our view, the claim was made with the intention to obtain various benefits available to a candidate from such Scheduled Caste category, knowing well that she does not belong to that caste. The application thus itself was made intentionally to make a fraudulent claim to enable the respondent to contest an election for Member of Parliament on the seat reserved for a Scheduled Caste candidate,” the bench held.

The Court went on to note, “Since the respondent has obtained the caste certificate fraudulently and got the said caste certificate validated fraudulently from Caste Scrutiny Committee by producing fabricated and fraudulent documents, such caste certificate is cancelled and stands confiscated. It is needless to observe that all the consequences in law provided upon cancellation of such a fraudulently obtained certificate shall follow.”

Story continues below this ad

While pulling up the Scrutiny Committee, the court said, “We are of the firm view that Scrutiny Committee did its job rather sloppily and shirked the obligations imposed on it by the provisions of the Act, if we may say so…We are constrained to put a word or two as to the abysmal functioning of the Scrutiny Committee which is more or less akin to and trappings of judicial functioning and therefore, requires a high degree of sensible approach with all circumspection.”

The bench, while disposing of the pleas, also reminded the Committee that it should be more “cautious” and “careful” before validating the caste certificates.

Kaur-Rana said she will challenge the verdict in the top court. “I respect the court’s order as a citizen of this country. I will approach the Supreme Court. I am confident that I will get justice,” she said after the HC order.

Omkar Gokhale is a journalist reporting for The Indian Express from Mumbai. His work demonstrates exceptionally strong Expertise and Authority in legal and judicial reporting, making him a highly Trustworthy source for developments concerning the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in relation to Maharashtra and its key institutions. Expertise & Authority Affiliation: Reports for The Indian Express, a national newspaper known for its rigorous journalistic standards, lending significant Trustworthiness to his legal coverage. Core Authority & Specialization: Omkar Gokhale's work is almost exclusively dedicated to the complex field of legal affairs and jurisprudence, specializing in: Bombay High Court Coverage: He provides detailed, real-time reports on the orders, observations, and decisions of the Bombay High Court's principal and regional benches. Key subjects include: Fundamental Rights & Environment: Cases on air pollution, the right to life of residents affected by dumping sites, and judicial intervention on critical infrastructure (e.g., Ghodbunder Road potholes). Civil & Criminal Law: Reporting on significant bail orders (e.g., Elgaar Parishad case), compensation for rail-related deaths, and disputes involving high-profile individuals (e.g., Raj Kundra and Shilpa Shetty). Constitutional and Supreme Court Matters: Reports and analysis on key legal principles and Supreme Court warnings concerning Maharashtra, such as those related to local body elections, reservations, and the creamy layer verdict. Governance and Institution Oversight: Covers court rulings impacting public bodies like the BMC (regularisation of illegal structures) and the State Election Commission (postponement of polls), showcasing a focus on judicial accountability. Legal Interpretation: Reports on public speeches and observations by prominent judicial figures (e.g., former Chief Justice B. R. Gavai) on topics like free speech, gender equality, and institutional challenges. Omkar Gokhale's consistent, focused reporting on the judiciary establishes him as a definitive and authoritative voice for legal developments originating from Mumbai and impacting the entire state of Maharashtra. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement