Child in mother’s custody ‘is not illegally detained’: Gujarat HC raps father for filing habeas corpus plea

The High Court told the father, whose wife had allegedly left their house with her son, to instead seek custody or explore visitation rights

gujarat hcOn Wednesday, after examining the police report and hearing submissions, Justice H D Suthar observed that the wife had “voluntarily left her matrimonial home” and the petitioner ought to have pursued the appropriate legal remedy

The Gujarat High Court on Wednesday dismissed a habeas corpus petition filed by an Ahmedabad-based man who sought for his estranged wife to produce their five-year-old son. She had allegedly left their house with their son recently.

The petitioner, who is not divorced, had claimed that his wife had “taken away their son illegally” and denied him any meeting or communication, in a petition filed last week. In his submissions based on a police report, the petitioner’s counsel told the court that he shared a “close bond” with the child and that the estranged wife had allegedly refused to meet or discuss the matter.

On October 27, the HC had directed the prosecutor to place on record the status of the missing persons complaint filed by the petitioner on October 9, regarding his wife and son.

Story continues below this ad

The court rebuked the petitioner for invoking habeas corpus instead of approaching a civil court for custody or visitation, stating that the mother is a “natural guardian” of the child and that the case cannot be considered as “illegal detention”. The observation came after the Bodakdev police in Ahmedabad submitted a report recording the wife’s statement.

On Wednesday, after examining the police report and hearing submissions, Justice H D Suthar observed that the wife had “voluntarily left her matrimonial home” and the petitioner ought to have pursued the appropriate legal remedy. The petition had also named a friend of the wife as a respondent, with whom she is said to be staying, according to the Bodakdev police’s report.

In its oral order, the court said, “….(The wife) left for Ahmedabad airport and travelled to Delhi and thereafter to Sikkim… She came back with the respondent (friend) residing at Gandhinagar… the court is of the view that no illegal detention or purpose is found as he is in the custody of a natural guardian, i.e. the mother.”

The court further said, “(The petitioner) can file for the appropriate remedy provided under the law for seeking custody or explore visitation rights, rather than filing a habeas corpus petition.”

Story continues below this ad

The HC also rejected the petitioner’s request for directions to the police to mediate a meeting with his estranged wife, stating that “it was not a matter concerning the police”.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement