‘Breath analyser test not entirely sufficient…’: Telangana High Court orders reinstatement of driver sacked for ‘drinking while on duty’ and protesting
The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, citing a breath analyser test that recorded 329 mg/100 ml of alcohol in the driver’s blood, maintained that the disciplinary action had a strong factual basis.
The TGSRTC argued this was direct, objective, and scientific evidence of intoxication.
The Telangana High Court has set aside the termination of a Telangana State Road Transport Corporation (TGSRTC) driver who was dismissed on charges of consuming alcohol while on duty and participating in a protest, citing a lack of conclusive medical evidence. In an October 7 judgment, Justice Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao held that “the breath analyser test is not entirely sufficient to prove the drunken condition”.
The petitioner, a driver with over 17 years of service, was issued a chargesheet on March 16, 2024, alleging he had consumed alcohol while on duty and later participated in a dharna. Following an inquiry, he was removed from service by the disciplinary authority on April 25, 2024, in an order subsequently upheld by the appellate authority on May 14, 2024, and the reviewing authority on July 30, 2024.
The TSRTC, citing a breath analyser test conducted on March 8, 2024, which recorded 329 mg/100 ml of alcohol in the driver’s blood, maintained that the disciplinary action had a strong factual basis. The TGSRTC argued this was direct, objective, and scientific evidence of intoxication. It further confirmed that the machine had tested 54 other employees that same day, with 26 showing a “0” reading, and refuted the petitioner’s claim of a faulty machine.
‘Discriminatory action’ over dharna
Story continues below this ad
The driver’s counsel contested the intoxication charge and argued that he was not consuming liquor while performing his duty. The counsel submitted that in line with prior judgments of both the Supreme Court and the high court, the oral testimony or a breath analyser result alone is insufficient without confirmation from blood and urine tests. Regarding the second charge of participating in a dharna, the petitioner claimed he attended the protest at 11:30 am, long after it commenced at 5.30 am. He also argued that 13 other employees participated in the dharna and yet only he was penalised.
After considering the arguments, the judge clarified that while the breath analyser report might be prima facie evidence, it necessitated sending the petitioner for further medical examination, specifically blood and urine tests, to ascertain the facts before punitive action is taken.
“The Court found the respondents’ decision to punish the petitioner solely on the breath analyser test, without considering his request for a recheck, to be illegal and arbitrary.”
On the second charge, the court noted the petitioner’s claim of discriminatory action, as 13 other employees who had participated in the protest were not penalised. As a result, the court set aside all three impugned orders. The TGSRTC was directed to immediately reinstate the driver into service, though the court denied the request for back wages.
Rahul V Pisharody is Assistant Editor with the Indian Express Online and has been reporting for IE on various news developments from Telangana since 2019. He is currently reporting on legal matters from the Telangana High Court.
Rahul started his career as a journalist in 2011 with The New Indian Express and worked in different roles at the Hyderabad bureau for over 8 years. As Deputy Metro Editor, he was in charge of the Hyderabad bureau of the newspaper and coordinated with the team of city reporters, district correspondents, other centres and internet desk for over three years.
A native of Palakkad in Kerala, Rahul has a Master's degree in Communication (Print and New Media) from the University of Hyderabad and a Bachelor's degree in Business Management from PSG College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore. ... Read More