Premium
This is an archive article published on February 14, 2024

‘Against basis of democracy’: TN Assembly passes resolution against delimitation, BJP lends support

BJP MLA says South India “should not suffer”, promises to raise issue with central leadership; House also passes resolution against 'One Nation, One Election'

MK StalinThe CM MK Stalin-led Tamil Nadu government passed the delimitation resolution that said the state was paying a price for its 'socio-economic development programmes and welfare schemes over the past 50 years. Express file photo

Days after Prime Minister Narendra Modi claimed attempts to divide the country along “North-South lines”, the Tamil Nadu government brought in two resolutions in the Assembly opposing the scheduled delimitation of poll constituencies in 2026 and the Centre’s measures for ‘One Nation One Election’.

The resolutions, which said the two moves went “against the basis of democracy”, were “impractical”, and “not enshrined in the Constitution”, were passed by the Assembly with overwhelming support, including from the opposition AIADMK. The BJP too said it understood the concerns regarding delimitation expressed in the resolution, thought it opposed the one on ‘One Nation, One Election’.

The resolution against delimitation said the exercise due in 2026, following the new Census, “not be carried out”. “Due to unavoidable reasons, if the number of (Lok Sabha and Assembly) seats on the basis of population were to (change), (they) shall be maintained at the present ratio for constituencies within states… and for both Houses of Parliament, (which were) fixed based on the population of 1971.”

Tamil Nadu, along with other states in the South, has been arguing that they should not be “penalised” for their successful implementation of population control measures, compared to high-population states such as Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.

Story continues below this ad

The issue has also taken the dimension of “financial atrocities” against the South, with the LDF-led Kerala and Congress-led Karnataka governments recently holding agitations in the Capital over the sharing of resources by the Centre with them. The Tamil Nadu government, led by the DMK in alliance with the Congress, lent its support to the two agitations.

Its delimitation resolution on Wednesday also worried that the state was paying a price for its “socio-economic development programmes and welfare schemes over the past 50 years”.

The ruling BJP at the Centre has been silent on the delimitation issue, with no clarity yet on even the Census, which was due originally in 2021. In his first remarks on the issue, Prime Minister Narendra Modi told a rally in poll-bound Telangana in October that the South “stands to lose 100 seats”.

Choosing a southern state to raise the issue, Modi used it as a counter to Rahul Gandhi’s slogan of “Jitni aabadi, utna haq (rights as per numbers)”. While the Congress links the slogan to its demand for a caste census, to reapportion quota benefits as per actual numbers of different groups, the PM said what Rahul was suggesting went against the South’s interests.

Story continues below this ad

“The country is now talking about the next delimitation. It will mean that wherever the population is less, the Lok Sabha seats will come down, and rise where the population is high… The southern states have achieved remarkable progress in population control, but will stand to lose heavily if the Congress’s new idea of rights in proportion to population is implemented… South India stands to lose 100 Lok Sabha seats… Will South India accept this? Will South India forgive the Congress?” Modi said.

Explained

TN taps into South fears

The delimitation issue holds resonance across southern states, which are also protesting against being “discriminated” against in distribution of funds. In his first remarks on the issue, PM Narendra Modi told a rally in poll-bound Telangana in October that the South “stands to lose 100 seats”.

Speaking during the Assembly proceedings, BJP MLA Vanathi Srinivasan said: “We agree with the argument that states in South India that have achieved certain socio-economic standards with their own efforts should not suffer in the delimitation process, the number of constituencies should not be affected due to our achievements. We agree with that… As the state unit of the BJP, we will definitely take up the cause of South India with the BJP central leadership.”

The second resolution passed by the Tamil Nadu government on Wednesday was against the BJP’s push for ‘One Nation, One Election’, on which the Centre has set up a panel headed by former President Ram Nath Kovind.

The resolution stressed the importance of conducting elections for local bodies, state Assemblies, and Parliament at different times, saying these were necessary to uphold “the principle of democratic decentralisation” and to cater to people-centric issues in a vast and diverse country like India.

Apart from the DMK’s allies, including the Congress, CPI(M), CPI, Dalit party VCP, Kongu Nadu Makkal Desiya Katchi, Tamizhga Vaazhvurimai Katchi, and Manithaneya Makkal Katchi, the AIADMK that was till recently an ally of the BJP also supported the resolutions.

Story continues below this ad

While the AIADMK gave unequivocal support to the resolution against delimitation, in case of ‘One Nation, One Election’, party MLA and former minister N Thalavai Sundaram said their backing was “conditional” and suggested that the exercise be rolled out over a decade, provided certain conditions were met.

Sundaram added that the AIADMK had made its representation before the Kovind panel, suggesting a 10-year lag and that EVMs be readied for this mass exercise in the next five years.

On delimitation, the AIADMK leader said: “The seats in state Assemblies and Parliament should not fall.”

While the BJP shared the concerns regarding the delimitation process, its MLA Srinivasan criticised the opposition to ‘One Nation, One Election’. Calling it a “necessary reform” and apprehensions regarding it “unfounded”, she said it could reduce financial and administrative burdens associated with frequent elections.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement

You May Like

Advertisement