Karnataka HC sets out guidelines for compassionate appointment, directs state to prepare standard operating procedure
The Karnataka High Court's Kalaburagi bench passed the order on a petition filed by the illiterate widow of a peon who had died while on duty.
3 min read
The order came in a case related to the widow of Raja Patel Banda, who was a peon at the Jewargi tahsildar's office and died while on duty in 2014. (File photo)The Karnataka High Court on July 25 set out guidelines for compassionate job appointments, including assistance for widows and illiterate persons, while also directing the state to prepare a standard operating procedure (SOP) for making such appointments.
A bench of Justices Mohammad Nawaz and K S Hemalekha of the high court’s Kalaburagi bench stated that regardless of whether applications are in the correct format or not, the authorities have to acknowledge them in 30 days along with information on the status of the application, any issues with documentation/formatting, limitation period, and rights of other dependents. The final decision has to be rendered within 90 days with a reasoned order. The court also directed that proactive steps have to be taken to assist widows and illiterate persons.
The order came in a case related to the widow of Raja Patel Banda, who was a peon at the Jewargi tahsildar’s office and died while on duty in 2014. Although his widow applied for a pension, retirement benefits, and a job for one of her sons on compassionate grounds, there was no official response.
Later, the state rejected an application that one of her sons submitted in October 2015 on the grounds of his having crossed the age limit. In February 2017, her younger son applied for a job on compassionate grounds. This application was rejected as, according to the regulations, any such application had to be submitted within one year of the death of the employee.
The family successfully challenged the rejection before the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal (Kalaburagi), after which the state approached the high court, arguing that the appointment was not a matter of right and had to follow rules concerning the time period, failing which there was a possibility of claims being put forward indefinitely.
On the other hand, the opposing counsel stated that it was an exceptional case where the widow, who was illiterate, had made an application within a year of her husband’s death, expressing a clear intent. It was the duty of the relevant department to have guided her regarding the technicalities, he further argued.
The court agreed, stating, “The intent was unambiguous. The authorities had the opportunity to consider and guide the family. The applications submitted by the widow ought to have been rejected or communicated to her. There was no intimation whatsoever….Had she been informed, she could have applied or rather asked her sons to make necessary applications within time.”
A duty to ensure procedural fairness
The court dismissed the state’s petition against the appointment, noting that the state has a duty to ensure procedural fairness in such cases.
The court also said, “A uniform Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) and training of officials handling compassionate appointments should be made by the Government to ensure no procedural lapses.”
You May Like
Photos
