Premium
This is an archive article published on April 22, 2020

Bombay HC quashes prosecution against 2 ex-IL&FS auditors

In this regard, the Centre has sought a stay for eight weeks before moving the apex court. The high court noted the interim protection from coercive action granted to auditors will continue during this period.

Bombay High Court, Bombay High Court ILFS case, ILFS fraud, ILFS crisis, ILFS audit, Deloitte Haskins audit ILFS, Sells audit While a Bench, led by Chief Justice Dharmadhikari, in its 198-paged judgment upheld the constitutional validity of Section 140 (5) of Companies Act, 2013, the court said the provision does not apply to auditors who have resigned. (File Photo)

In a major relief to former Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services (IL&FS) auditors BSR & Associates (a KPMG-affiliated firm) and Deloitte Haskins and Sells, the Bombay High Court on Tuesday quashed criminal prosecution against the auditing companies before a special court in Mumbai.

The court quashed the prosecution based on a criminal complaint filed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs’ Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) against the auditors, who were accused of connivance in the IL&FS financial fraud case, observing it to be ‘non-maintainable’. The SFIO filed a complaint on May 30.

In this regard, the Centre has sought a stay for eight weeks before moving the apex court. The high court noted the interim protection from coercive action granted to auditors will continue during this period.

Story continues below this ad

A Bench of Chief Justice Bhushan P Dharmadhikari and Justice Nitin R Borkar passed a judgment through video conference in pleas filed by IL&FS Financial Services Ltd (IFIN) auditors, challenging the Centre’s move seeking a ban on auditing companies for five years. The Bench had reserved its judgment for January 13 this year.

While a Bench, led by Chief Justice Dharmadhikari, in its 198-paged judgment upheld the constitutional validity of Section 140 (5) of Companies Act, 2013, the court said the provision does not apply to auditors who have resigned.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement