On the second day of the hearing, the court heard arguments on the changing legal landscape on LGBTQ rights and the evolution of the right to choose one’s partner. Here are some of the key cases that trace the shift in the law over the years.
Same sex marriage issue in SC: The CJI clarified that the hearing’s scope would be limited to developing a notion of a “civil union” that finds legal recognition under the Special Marriage Act.
The petition seeks the right to marry for same-sex couples, which brings with it a host of rights, privileges, and obligations that are “bestowed and protected by the law”.
A bench led by CJI Chandrachud has agreed to hear the PIL challenging Section 5(4) of the Maternity Benefit Act on April 28. Here is what the case is all about.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan argued that instead of implementing the new recruitment scheme, the government should complete the old process and cited the doctrine of promissory estoppel.
A bench comprising Justices MR Shah and CT Ravikumar on April 10 observed that the court needs to review a landmark 1992 ruling, which held that no detention in police custody beyond the first 15 days’ arrest is permissible.
According to the new IT rules, any online content that the ministry-appointed fact-checking body marks as “fake or misleading” will have to be taken down by online intermediaries if they wish to retain legal immunity against third-party content.
The state’s assembly had passed the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Online Gambling and Regulation of Online Games Ordinance, 2022 last October. However, in early March, the Governor RN Ravi had returned the ordinance for reconsideration.
In the MediaOne judgment, the top court devised a procedure to balance the principles of justice with non-disclosure of information on grounds of national security
As per the legal notice, OTT platform Netflix has been asked to remove the first episode of season two where the character of Raj allegedly refers to Madhuri Dixit using a "derogatory term".
Rahul Gandhi's appeal has called the sentence 'harsh and highly excessive', arguing that it was pronounced in 'hot haste'. Here is what the appeal says.
The MHA had cited alleged links between the channel’s promoters Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited and Jamaat-e-Islami Hind for denying the security clearance to Media One. Following this, the channel was taken off the air
In quashing ban on TV channel, apex court makes key observations on role of the press in a democracy, and underlines principles of natural and open justice.
The apex court also criticised the 'sealed cover procedure' adopted and the 'cavalier manner' in which the Centre 'raised the claim of national security'.
In the current ruling, the court also spoke of the dangers of “unjust imprisonment” which puts the inmates at risk of “prisonisation,” a “radical transformation” by which a prisoner loses his identity.
Anushka Sharma claimed that the authority had "erroneously" noted that she had acquired "copyright" through endorsements and by anchoring award functions, and had sold or transferred it.
The case originates from a hearing of Kejriwal’s second appeal before the CIC in a case relating to the supply of information about his Electoral Photo Identity Card (EPIC).
One of the major changes in the amended law is that it affords the Competition Commission of India (CCI) the ability to penalise entities found engaging in anti-competitive behaviour based on their global turnover.
Following the judgment, even 15 years after the blast, which resulted in the deaths of 80 people and injured 185 others, no person now stands convicted of the crime. Here's why.
A product of India and Pakistan's colonial rule, the 'sedition law' has always been contentious on account of how it can be used to curb dissent.
The WPA aims to conserve protected species of birds, animals, and some plants in two main ways: by prohibiting the hunting of all protected species and protecting their habitat through sanctuaries, national parks, reserves, etc.
On January 13, the Lok Sabha Secretariat notified Faizal's disqualification under Section 8(3) of The Representation of the People Act, 1951. This is the same section under which Rahul Gandhi was disqualified in a defamation case.
Rahul Gandhi was sentenced to two years in jail recently by a Surat Court in a defamation case. Another defamation proceeding is on against him. Here's what that case is about.
Sitting Members of Parliament enjoy a variety of amenities, from free phone calls to travel allowances.
Wayanad MP Rahul Gandhi has lost his Lok Sabha seat after being convicted of criminal defamation by a Surat court. What happens now — and what are the best- and worst-case scenarios for him?



