Journalism of Courage
Advertisement
Premium

SC rejects Govts review petition in Vodafone case

Govt can't tax overseas acquisition deal between Vodafone and Hutchison,maintains apex court.

Listen to this article Your browser does not support the audio element.

The Supreme Court today dismissed the government petition seeking a review of its judgment in the Vodafone tax case,signalling that it stands by the legal basis of the verdict.

The court had held on January 20 that the Income Tax department did not have the jurisdiction to levy Rs 11,000 crore tax on the offshore transaction between Vodafone International Holdings and Hutchison Group.

The dismissal by a bench of Chief Justice of India S H Kapadia and Justices K S Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar followed a government proposal in the Union Budget providing for a clarificatory retrospective amendment in the Income Tax Act,with effect from 1962,to restate the legislative intent that overseas deals which derive their value substantially from domestic assets can be taxed.

Welcoming the Supreme Court oder,Vodafone said: This once again emphasises the legality and bona fides of the transaction. The Supreme Courts clear and unambiguous ruling today,based on the existing laws of India,reiterates that the Indian tax authority does not have the jurisdiction to tax the transaction.

The government explained that the need for a clarification was triggered by certain judicial pronouncements which have created doubts.

In a majority judgment in January,the CJIs Bench had held that the offshore deal between Hutchison Telecommunications International Ltd (a Cayman Islands company) and Vodafone International Holdings (a company incorporated in Netherlands) to transfer shares of CGP (a company incorporated in Cayman Islands) was a bona fide structured foreign direct investment into India which fell outside Indias territorial tax jurisdiction,hence not taxable.

Through the US $11.2 billion deal in May 2007,Vodafone had acquired 67 per cent stake in Hutchison-Essar Ltd. The court had observed that the offshore transaction was not a sham or tax avoidant preordained transaction.

Story continues below this ad

On February 17,the government had contended in its review petition that the court failed to appreciate that the deal did not involve FDI inflow into India. The review had criticised the SC verdict,saying it had the effect of legitimising transactions routed through tax havens and thus binding the hands of IT authorities.

Government lawyers who were part of the Vodafone litigation in the SC said the January 20 judgment was based on the tax law now prevalent,and once the proposed amendment to tax laws was passed in Parliament,the onus would be on Vodafone to challenge it.

Curated For You
Dilip Kumars sisters created hostile environment for wife Saira Banu leading to her hospitalisation; orchestrated his second marriage to drive her away
Malayalam cinemas most iconic tragedy was written in 3 days, shot in 25 days at a cost of Rs 23.5 lakh; Mohanlal charged just Rs 4 lakh
Congress SOS from Odisha: Responsibility in wrong hands, Priyanka Gandhi should take leadership role

 

Tags:
  • business news
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Express OpinionRabindranath Tagore's 'Bande Mataram' carried a message that 'Vande Mataram' did not
X