If there is an “automatic cancellation” of bail, it affects the fundamental right of a person and denies the valuable right to natural justice, observed Madhya Pradesh high court in a recent judgment and said that “such a condition could not be made part of the bail order”.
“Cancelling bail order directly affects the freedom of a person which affects his fundamental rights. Any order which is passed affecting the freedom of a person must be passed after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing. Reasonable opportunity of hearing is a fundamental right under the Constitution,” observed Justice Vishal Dhagat and recalled a March 2022 order of the high court.
The court was dealing with the 2022 high court order to the police to arrest an accused in connection with a cheating case after holding that his bail “automatically stood cancelled” for failing to appear before the police, a bail condition set by the high court.
In November 2021, while granting him bail, the high court had directed the accused to deposit Rs 10 lakh before the trial court and mark his presence before the police on the 15th of every month.
The order also stated that if he failed to mark even a single appearance, his “bail would stand automatically cancelled.”
The accused, who failed to appear before the police on two occasions in January and February 2022, applied for a modification of the bail conditions in the 2021 order.
Dismissing the modification plea in March 2022, the court ordered the police to arrest the accused.
He filed another plea to recall the dismissal order.
The accused submitted before the court that being a resident of Banaras, it takes him four days to travel and mark his presence before the police.
Opposing his application, the state argued that the high court has powers to impose conditions while granting bail.