Premium
This is an archive article published on April 9, 2010

SC to consider worship of Lord Rama in Ayodhya

SC agreed to consider a plea for removing restrictions imposed by authorities in Ayodhya on worship of Lord Rama.

The Supreme Court today agreed to consider a plea for removing alleged unreasonable restrictions imposed by the authorities in Ayodhya on worshipping of Lord Rama in the temple at the disputed site.

“We will consider your plea,” a Bench comprising Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan and Justice Deepak Verma said while asking Janata Party chief Subramanian Swamy,a party in the matter,to move a fresh application in this regard.

“You have to a file proper application and then only the respondents can file response,” the Bench said and gave three weeks time to him to submit the application.

Story continues below this ad

The Janata Party chief told the court that he has filed an affidavit as directed by it in March last year which contains the prayers sought by him.

“My prayer is against the restrictions imposed on worship,” he said and drew the attention of the bench that he has been impleaded as a party in the pending matter.

During the brief hearing,Swamy clarified to the bench that he was not raising the question of whether Ram temple be built at the site or not but restricting his prayers to worship of Lord Rama in the makeshift temple.

He has alleged that authorities in Ayodhya have put unreasonable restrictions on worshipping of Lord Rama in the temple at the disputed site.

Story continues below this ad

Earlier on January 29,he had submitted that irrespective of the final outcome relating to the title deed dispute pending in the Allahabad High Court,the authorities should ensure adequate arrangements for devotees to have a ‘darshan’ of the idols. Denial of the same was violative of their fundamental rights,he had said.

Swamy has contended that the regulations imposed on the puja practice by the Uttar Pradesh Government in consultation with the Statutory Receiver,the Commissioner,Faizabad District,were unreasonable and unnecessarily harsh.

“According to this applicant (Swamy),these (regulations) are highly derogatory,humiliating and unreasonable and particularly harsh on aged,infirm or even female devotees,” the affidavit placed by him in support of his application before the bench said.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement
Advertisement