Govt subsidy for Haj not unconstitutional: SC

A bench of justices Markandeya Katju and Gyan Sudha Mishra said in an order that nothing was unconstitutional if a small portion of public money is used for subidising pilgrimage.

“In our opinion,Article 27 would be violated if a substantial part of the entire income tax collected in India,or a substantial part of the entire central excise or the customs duties or sales tax or a substantial part of any other tax collected in India,were to be utilized for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination.

“In other words,suppose 25 per cent of the entire income tax collected in India was utilized for promoting or maintaining any particular religion or religious denomination,that,in our opinion,would be violative of Article 27 of the Constitution,” the bench said in the ruling.

The apex court made the remarks while dismising a petition filed by former BJP MP Prafull Goradia challenging the constitutional validity of the Haj Committee Act 1959 on the ground that it was violative of the Constitution particulary,Article 27.