Premium
This is an archive article published on February 1, 2019

Third judge recuses himself from hearing PIL challenging Rao’s appointment as interim CBI chief

The case was allocated to him after Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justice A K Sikri recused themselves from the case.

M Nageshwar Rao, CBI, Supreme Court, NV Ramana, indian express news, latest news, Interim CBI Director M Nageshwar Rao.

Justice N V Ramana of the Supreme Court on Thursday recused himself from hearing a PIL challenging the appointment of IPS officer M Nageswara Rao as Interim Director of the CBI, becoming the third judge to do so in the matter.

As the petition came up before a bench comprising him and Justices M Shantanagoudar and Indira Banerjee, Justice Ramana decided to recuse himself, saying he knew Rao as he was from his home state and that he had attended his daughter’s wedding.

The court then ordered, “List this matter before a Bench, of which one of us (N.V. Ramana, J.) is not a member.”

Story continues below this ad

Senior counsel Dushyant Dave, appearing for the petitioner NGO Common Cause, requested that the matter be listed for hearing on February 1. The court recorded this in the order and directed the Registry “to place this matter before Hon’ble Chief Justice, for listing of this matter before an appropriate Bench”.

The petition has now been listed for Friday before a bench of Justices Arun Mishra and Navin Sinha.

Rao was appointed CBI interim director on January 10, after its Director Alok Verma was transferred out by a high-powered committee comprising PM Narendra Modi, Justice A K Sikri and Leader of the Congress parliamentary party in Lok Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge. The NGO subsequently challenged Rao’s appointment in the Supreme Court.

The PIL first came up for hearing on January 21 before a bench headed by CJI Ranjan Gogoi. The CJI, however, recused himself, saying that he was scheduled to be on the high-powered committee which was scheduled to meet again on January 24 to choose a new CBI director.

Story continues below this ad

The CJI bench directed that the matter be listed before court number 2 on January 24. Accordingly, it came up before court number 2 headed by Justice A K Sikri on the scheduled date. However, Justice Sikri also recused himself, saying he was not in a position to hear it, and told the NGO’s lawyers, “you should understand my position… This has to go before another bench.”

The high-powered committee met on January 24, but it could not take a decision on any name.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement