Premium
This is an archive article published on February 9, 2015

60 prosecutions launched, any additional names will be brought under probe: Jaitley

Stating that the details that have come out today are more or less in line with what is available with the government, Jaitley said.

india black Money, black money,  indian swiss bank, swiss account list, black money probe, black money list, India black money list, account holders black money,  swissleaks, black money, swiss bank account, Switzerland bank, name of swiss account holders, swiss bank account, HSBC india black Money #Swissleaks: The Indian Express expose on the number of Indian HSBC clients.

Reacting to The Indian Express expose on the number of Indian HSBC clients having almost doubled–from the earlier 628 names to the newly-revealed 1,195 names–Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley today  said that any additional names of resident Indians that surface will surely be brought under the scope of the government’s proceedings.

“Some additional names have come. Now if those additional names are those of resident Indians who have accounts, a case is called for. If they are foreign citizens or non-residents, then there is a different dimension to it. If names of any resident Indians come in this, which are additional, we’ll surely take them in the purview of our proceedings,” Jaitley said, when asked about the revelations made in The Indian Express.

READ: HSBC Indian list just doubled to 1195 names. Balance: Rs 25420 cr

Story continues below this ad

The minister also stated that the government had said a few months back that prosecutions were being launched against the accounts which were being found illegal. “Around three months back, three prosecutions had been launched. Now, approximately 60 prosecutions have been launched. And the government has said that when prosecution is launched after concluding investigations, those names become public when they are put in the cases in the courts,” he said.

Stating that the out of the “details that have come today, a majority of names are those which the Government of India or the Revenue Department already have”, the Finance Minister said, “The question is not about the names…but also the evidence of the accounts of those names. And evidence in addition to the stolen data is required, so that a strong case can be made.”

READ: The List: Who’s Who & How Much

“Just having names wouldn’t lead to adequate action in the court. If the evidence in relation of that name is authentic…the action is only going to be successful then,” he added. “Doing something without evidence and then not being able to prove it wouldn’t be very profitable,” Jaitley said.

The Finance Minister also said that in the 628 accounts that came to light earlier, “some had names, some names were identifiable…some were not”.

FULL COVERAGE: SWISS LEAKS

Story continues below this ad

“In the past 7-8 months, prompt proceedings have begun on this. And in these proceedings, the first thing is to identify the names. A great number of them have already been identified. There are some very general kind of names which don’t have an address or other details and hence they are difficult to identify,” he added.

READ: Explained: What’s new, why it’s important

“After identifying, assessment of around 350 account holders has been completed. The proceedings on penalty have begun. The assessment of the remaining accounts will be over by March 31. As per law, action will be taken,” Jaitley further said.

http://www.publicintegrity.org/node/16702/syndication/tracking

The Finance Minister also said that the Narendra Modi government had sent a delegation to talk to the Swiss authorities in October 2014 “because the evidence lies in Switzerland”.

“Switzerland said that since this is stolen data, they can’t cooperate on stolen data as per their policy. Following that our team and the Swiss authorities entered a joint agreement, on October 15 (2014), that even if you don’t cooperate on basis of stolen data… if we are able to provide some evidence in addition to the stolen data…so the Swiss authorities agreed…then on basis of that additional evidence that you provide, we’ll confirm or deny the correctness of that evidence and we will cooperate in giving the details on basis of that evidence,” Jaitley said.

Story continues below this ad

He also said that during his Davos visit last month, he had met the Finance and Economy ministers and the Swiss revenue officials and he “tried to take this matter forward with them”.

“In our assessment proceedings, there are some case where people have admitted to having accounts. The question that was raised was that is an admission by an assesee…will it be regarded as additional evidence…to which they said that it would be regarded as evidence. So on that basis, we have got more independent evidence,” Jaitley said.

He also said it “may be remembered that this money and these account details are of 2006-07” and that “these names only came in 2010”. “And thus, those people had a lot of time to deal with these accounts and to deal with the money. We started our action in 2014…after May, 2014. So that’s why penalty and prosecution are ways to punish the account holders and to get back the amount from them. Those proceedings are on,” he said, adding that while he couldn’t give much details but wanted to indicate that the “Revenue Department is in active touch with the informants”.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement