Premium
This is an archive article published on October 29, 2018

CBI vs CBI: HC pulls up agency for delay, directs to maintain status quo against Asthana till Nov 1

The CBI prosecution had sought more time for replying in the case saying that the delay in submitting replies happened as the case files have been sent to the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) and that the entire team has been changed. 

Rakesh Asthana: Fodder scam to Godhra, never far from limelight A bench of Justice Najmi Waziri directed the probe agency to submit replies on the pleas seeking quashing of FIR before November 1 in the case. (File)

THE DELHI High Court Monday pulled up the CBI for not filing its reply to a plea by the agency’s Special Director Rakesh Asthana and said that it should abide by its earlier order on maintaining “status quo” on proceedings in the FIR lodged against the officer on alleged bribery charges.

“CBI shall maintain status quo till the next date of hearing, November 1,” Justice Najmi Wazari said. The court asked the agency to file its response before the next hearing. On October 23, the court had asked the CBI to maintain “status quo” on the proceedings initiated against Asthana who had sought in a plea that no coercive action be taken against him while the probe into the matter was underway.

On Monday, CBI counsel K Raghavacharyulu urged the court to grant the agency more time to place its affidavit on pleas by Asthana and CBI’s Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Devender Kumar, who sought quashing of an FIR lodged against him and three others on October 15 under various sections of the IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act.

Story continues below this ad
CBI power shift: PIL in SC against govt move on Alok Verma to be heard today CBI power shift: PIL has been filed in SC against govt move on Alok Verma.

The agency claimed that after the Supreme Court asked the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) to look into the matter, the Investigating officer (IO) of the cases had handed over all the documents. However, the court said the issue before the Supreme Court was different and that there was “no whisper and even no reference to the present case”. “You (CBI) were asked to file your counter affidavit to the present petitions. You took three days’ time. Despite that, you say that you need more time,” the court said.

Apologising to the court, the CBI counsel said: “We will be able to… by the next date.” The bench then asked the CBI to submit the name of the officer on whose instructions the agency would file the affidavit. “The reply shall be filed without fail and status quo to continue,” the bench ordered.

The court, however, declined to intervene in the custody of Devender Kumar, who claimed through senior advocate Dayan Krishnan that his custody was illegal and he should be released immediately. Kumar is presently in CBI custody. On October 22, Kumar was arrested for “falsification of records” in connection with bribery allegations involving Asthana. At the time, Kumar was the investigating officer in the Moin Qureshi case as part of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) headed by Asthana. Kumar was named accused No. 2 in an FIR filed by the CBI, which named Asthana as accused No. 1. On October 23, the government sent the CBI Director Alok Verma and Asthana on leave after both raised serious corruption charges against each other.

Appearing for Asthana in the High Court, senior advocate Amarendra Sharan and advocate Amit Anand Tiwari said that he had submitted a proposal for the arrest and custodial interrogation of Sana Sathish Babu, the complainant in the present FIR, Qureshi and others after he found evidence against them. According to the FIR, Sana, a witness in the Qureshi case, allegedly paid bribes to Asthana for getting relief in the investigation from the SIT headed by him. However, Asthana alleged that this FIR showed “how the highest officer of the premier investigating agency of the country” was trying to falsely implicate him, the second most senior officer of the agency, to hide his “own criminal misconduct of influencing investigations in exchange for money”.

Story continues below this ad

On Monday, the High Court also sought the response of the CBI by October 31 on a plea by alleged middleman Manoj Prasad seeking the quashing of the FIR against him in the alleged bribery case involving Asthana.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement
Advertisement