Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram
There has to be at least a casual connection between an accident and employment to claim compensation under Workmen Compensation Act,the Bombay High Court ruled recently while quashing a Workmen Compensation Commissioners order awarding Rs 4.15 lakh to wife of a man who died in an accident.
According to the wife,contract labourer Ajaykumar Tiwari met with an accident on May 2,2007,while on his way home from factory.
She had claimed compensation stating that Tiwari left the factory after duty hours. It is alleged that a truck rammed into the motorcycle,killing Tiwari,who was the pillion rider.
The Commissioner concluded that the employee was a workman and died while discharging his duty. He awarded Rs 4,15,960 to the wife as compensation. However,United India Insurance Company moved the High Court challenging the commissioners order on ground that the accident did not take place when the victim was on duty and that it did not arise out of and in course of employment.
Justice C L Pangarkar took note of the apex court observations in such cases which held that in case of an accident there needs to be a casual connection between the accident and the employment. It was also held that the accident must have been suffered in course of employment.
Justice Pangarkar held that in the instant case Tiwari did not die during the course of his employment and therefore his widow is not entitled to compensation under the Workmen compensation Act,1923.
Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram