Premium
This is an archive article published on August 13, 2024

HC restrains Indrani Mukerjea from travelling abroad till Aug 27, suggests ‘complete bank work from India’

Mukerjea, accused of murdering her daughter Sheena Bora in 2012, is currently out on bail.

Indrani Mukerjea, sheena bora murder case, Indrani Mukerjea case, Indrani Mukerjea travel ban extension, Bombay HC, CBI, Bombay High ultimatum, Indrani Mukerjea case update, Indian express newsIndrani Mukerjea (File Photo)

The Bombay High Court on Monday advised former media executive Indrani Mukerjea to complete her tasks, including bank work, from India rather than travelling to Spain and the United Kingdom. The court suggested that a viable solution could be found, and if it was determined that her physical presence in those countries was essential, the CBI could consider her request for travel.

A single-judge bench of Justice Shyam C Chandak extended the interim order preventing Mukerjea from traveling abroad until August 27, when it will review the CBI’s challenge against a special court’s permission allowing Mukerjea to travel for 10 days within the next three months. Mukerjea, accused of murdering her daughter Sheena Bora in 2012, is currently out on bail.

On Monday, advocate Shreeram Shirsat, representing the CBI, argued that tasks Mukerjea intended to complete abroad, such as payment of property tax and municipal fees, could be handled online or through postal services, eliminating the need for her to travel.

Story continues below this ad

Advocate Ranjeet Sangle, representing Mukerjea, countered that she needed to access her bank accounts in Spain. Sangle also noted that while the Supreme Court’s bail order required Mukerjea to seek trial court permission to travel abroad, the special court had already granted this, and the CBI should not override this decision.

Shirsat responded that if Mukerjea obtained a visa for another country, the central agency would not have control over her travel plans. He also mentioned that Mukerjea’s property in Spain had been in disrepair for nine years and required repair work. Sangle argued that Mukerjea’s Power of Attorney (POA), granted while she was in prison and later revoked due to divorce, did not empower others to handle her affairs in her absence.

Justice Chandak observed that Mukerjea had introduced new tasks beyond those initially listed in her application to the trial court. The judge warned Mukerjea that adding tasks such as repairs might appear disingenuous and negatively impact her case.

The judge instructed Mukerjea and the CBI to prepare detailed lists distinguishing tasks that could be completed without traveling abroad from those requiring her physical presence. “This will determine the outcome of the case. Focus on tasks that can be done outside of the UK and Spain (in India). If you mix them, it will reflect poorly,” Justice Chandak said, scheduling the next hearing for August 27.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement