Premium
This is an archive article published on August 21, 2023

Cruise ship drug bust bribery case: HC extends Wankhede’s interim protection from arrest till Sep 7

The former NCB zonal director has urged the Bombay High Court to bar the CBI from giving any information about its probe to the media.

Sameer WankhedeThe case pertains to the Rs 25-crore bribe allegedly demanded by Sameer Wankhede, among other accused, from the families of Aryan Khan and others who were arrested in the 2021 Cordelia drug bust case. (Express photo by Praveen Khanna)
Listen to this article
Cruise ship drug bust bribery case: HC extends Wankhede’s interim protection from arrest till Sep 7
x
00:00
1x 1.5x 1.8x

The Bombay High Court on Monday extended till September 7 the interim protection from coercive action granted to Sameer Wankhede, a former Mumbai zonal director of the Narcotics Control Bureau, in the bribery case related to the drug bust on a cruise ship.

The case, registered by the CBI, pertains to the Rs 25-crore bribe allegedly demanded by Wankhede, among other accused, from the families of Aryan Khan (son of actor Shah Rukh Khan) and others arrested in the 2021 Cordelia drug bust case.

A bench of Justice Nitin W Sambre and Justice Rajesh S Patil said it would hear Wankhede’s plea on September 5 after it was told that he would argue on the date and that Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta would appear for the central agency on September 7.

Last month, Wankhede sought directives from the court to bar the CBI from giving any information about the investigation to the media.

Wankhede, through senior advocate Aabad Ponda, claimed before a bench led by Justice A S Gadkari, which was earlier hearing the case, that as per Section 7A of the amended Prevention of Corruption Act, the bribe giver should also be prosecuted along with the bribe taker.

He had added that while Section 13 of the Act mentions disproportionate assets as an offence, the CBI had not charged Wankhede under the section.

Ponda had also argued that while sanction to prosecute was granted by the Union home ministry, Wankhede had been employed under the finance ministry throughout his career. Therefore, the sanction under section under 17A of the Act was not proper and was without authority, he argued.

Story continues below this ad

The CBI opposed the plea and said it had not passed on any information and that an inquiry would be conducted to ascertain the facts.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement