Premium
This is an archive article published on August 19, 2024

Antilia terror scare case: Bombay HC seeks NIA reply to Waze’s habeas corpus plea against ‘wrong detention’, invoking UAPA

Senior advocate Aabad Ponda for Waze submitted before a division bench of Justices Bharati H Dangre and Manjusha A Deshpande that Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act was invoked by the NIA at a later date and it started investigation even before that and it was unwarranted.

Antilia terror scare case, Bombay HC, NIA reply, Sachin Waze’s habeas corpus plea, UAPA case, National Investigation Agency, Antilia bomb scare case, Mansukh Hiran murder case, Indian express newsIt granted time to the NIA to file an affidavit followed by Waze’s rejoinder if necessary and posted further hearing to September 23. (File Photo)

The Bombay High Court on Monday sought an affidavit in reply from the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to the habeas corpus plea filed by dismissed police officer Sachin Waze, the main accused in the Antilia bomb scare case and the death of businessman Mansukh Hiran. Waze claimed that he had been wrongly detained by the NIA in the case.

Senior advocate Aabad Ponda for Waze submitted before a division bench of Justices Bharati H Dangre and Manjusha A Deshpande that Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act was invoked by the NIA at a later date and it started investigation even before that and it was unwarranted.

Ponda added that Waze was wrongly charged with UAPA with a claim of him planting gelatin sticks and threat letter in an SUV near Antilia, the residence of industrialist Mukesh Ambani in South Mumbai on February 25, 2021.

Story continues below this ad

After perusing the plea, the bench orally asked Waze’s counsel if it was a petition in a court or a thesis for Ph.D quoting poet and playwright Oscar Wilde, to which Ponda responded that Waze had drafted the same from Taloja central prison where he is in judicial custody and his 15-16 hours everyday go into filing petitions and researching on the criminal law.

“On perusal of the petition, we deem it appropriate to have a response of the NIA, since the petition seeks multiple reliefs, primary relief being his production before the court (habeas corpus), in the background that he has been wrongly detained,” the bench noted.

It granted time to the NIA to file an affidavit followed by Waze’s rejoinder if necessary and posted further hearing to September 23.

On August 14, the bench had concluded the hearing and reserved its order on another  plea by Waze seeking bail after being incarcerated for over two years in a corruption case involving former Maharashtra Home Minister Anil Deshmukh and others. The court is likely to pass an order on granting interim relief to Waze on August 23.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement

You May Like

Advertisement