Premium
This is an archive article published on May 28, 2016

2006 murder case of elderly couple: ‘Circumstantial evidence’: CBI nabs two

Earlier, the state CB-CID had filed a closure report in 2008 after it failed to get any evidence. The daughter of the deceased couple later approached Supreme Court, which ordered CBI probe in 2013.

The CBI has arrested two cousins in connection with a 2006 murder case of an elderly couple from Kanpur. The agency on Friday procured police custody remand (PCR) of the duo for three days after producing them before the CBI court in Lucknow.

Earlier, the state CB-CID had filed a closure report in 2008 after it failed to get any evidence. The daughter of the deceased couple later approached Supreme Court, which ordered CBI probe in 2013.

The couple — Lallu Prasad Dixit (65) and Savitri Devi (61) — were found murdered in their house at Salempur village in Kanpur on July 31, 2006. While Lallu Prasad was strangled to death, his wife was hit with a blunt object on her head, causing her death. “We arrested Surender Shukla (34) and his cousin Mahender Shukla (35) after they kept changing their statements and could not give specific reasons behind their presence near Dixit’s house when the murders took place. We have evidence corroborating that both had visited couple’s house a few hours before their bodies were found,” said a CBI official.

[related-post]

Story continues below this ad

“We sought custodial interrogation of the two to question them about the motive behind the murder, as their arrest has been made on the basis of circumstantial evidence. The PCR will start from Saturday morning,” he added.

While Mahender belongs to Tajpura village, Surender is a resident of neighbouring Beedi Rawal village, both in Unnao district. They both are in dairy business. Surender’s in-laws live near the couple’s residence.

During investigation, the CBI found that Surender had come to visit his in-laws on July 30 evening in 2006. Mahender too arrived a few hours later. Both later went to Lallu Prasad’s house. The next morning, the couple was found dead. When police arrived, Surender had left his in-laws’ house. The agency also found that Surender had called up the owner of a PCO near Lallu Prasad’s house and asked him if police was inquiring about him. As the PCO owner replied in the negative, Surender reached his in-laws’ house.

Following the incident, Lallu Prasad’s relative, Kamal Kumar Pandey, lodged a murder complaint at Maharajpur police station. Later, police added IPC Section 460 (lurking house-trespass or house-breaking by night punishable where death or grievous hurt) in the FIR when Lallu Prasad’s daughter, Asha Devi, alleged that cash, jewellery and a licensed rifle was also missing.

Story continues below this ad

As police failed to trace the accused, the state government, on the family’s request, transferred the probe to the CB-CID. However, the state agency too failed to collect any evidence and filed a closure report in 2008.

Following this, Asha moved the district court, suspecting that someone known to her family was behind the murder. However, the court rejected her petition. She then moved to the Allahabad High Court, seeking a CBI inquiry. That petition too was rejected, said a CBI official.

Asha later filed a Special Leave Petition before the SC and CBI was ordered to investigate the case in October 2013.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement