The Delhi High Court Wednesday refused to entertain a plea seeking direction to the Centre to take action against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) convenor Arvind Kejriwal and Samajwadi Party (SP) chief Akhilesh Yadav for allegedly making “misleading and false statements” with an intent to “damage” India’s “image and credibility”.
A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora observed, “This court is also of the view that the principle of relaxation of locus standi is not called for in this petition. This court is also of the view that the petitioner underestimates the wisdom of the Indian voters. Accordingly, this court is of the view that no orders are called in the writ petition and the same is closed”.
The court also observed that the individuals who are alleged to have been defamed have the means to approach the court and file appropriate proceedings.
Referring to news reports on media channels and social media platforms, the plea stated that Gandhi, Kejriwal and Yadav made a “misleading and false statement” regarding alleged waiver of loans of Rs 16 crore of a few industrialists by the central government.
The plea sought a direction to the Centre to register a complaint and prosecute the three leaders, and also to direct several social media platforms and the political parties to which these leaders belong to remove these statements from their electronic and social media platforms.
During the hearing, the bench orally stated: “If the industrialists are aggrieved or the politicians are aggrieved, they will take action. Don’t underestimate the mind of the voter. They know who is speaking the truth and who is not. Don’t involve us in this…”
The petitioner, Surjit Singh Yadav, had claimed in his plea, “It is well known that as per Reserve Bank of India (RBI), write off is not same as waive off but writing off loans has been shown by respondent no. 3 to 9 (Gandhi, Yadav, Kejriwal, their political parties and news outlets) as waiving off loans. This deliberate twist to the actual meaning of writing off loans by these respondents had created confusion in the minds of readers/ viewers including in the mind of the petitioner, thereby, resulting in the image of the central government getting downgraded.”
The plea stated that these “factually wrong statements made by such political personalities cast an indelible negative impression” in the minds of the readers or viewers, including the petitioner.