Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram
In a case seeking quashing of an FIR under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, the Delhi High Court pulled up the city police after they registered an FIR against the accused, assuming that the victim must be a minor as she was a class 12 student.
A single judge bench of Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar was hearing a plea on February 13, seeking quashing of the FIR registered against a man for rape (IPC section 376), criminal intimidation (Section 506) and aggravated penetrative sexual assault (Section 6) under POCSO, on the ground that the matter had been settled between the accused and the victim who also got married on November 10, 2022, are now “living happily together as husband and wife”.
After the court issued notice, it asked the Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the Delhi Police on what ground was Section 6 of POCSO invoked, the APP submitted that since the victim was in class 12 at the time of the incident so it was presumed that she must be a minor.
Section 6 of POCSO provides the punishment for aggravated penetrative sexual assault wherein whoever commits the same shall be punished with “rigorous imprisonment” for a term not less than 20 years, but which may extend to life imprisonment–which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of natural life of that person and shall also be liable to fine, or with “death”.
Justice Bhatnagar termed the submission as “highly preposterous” and observed, “Without any document on record, how can one presuppose that the victim is a minor, even a major girl can be in 12th standard.”
The APP sought time to file a status report which the court allowed. As the investigating officer from Sultanpuri police station was not present in the court, Justice Bhatnagar issued a “court notice” to the DCP concerned to appear on the next date and apprise the court as to why the IO concerned was not present.
Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram