Premium
This is an archive article published on July 7, 2022

HSWC scam: Court issues notice to Haryana over quashing of FIR plea

Another Haryana IAS officer Sanjeev Verma, Managing Director of the Haryana State Warehousing Corporation (HSWC), is also an accused in this case along with Ravinder.

Senior Haryana IAS officer Ashok Kumar Khemka (File)Senior Haryana IAS officer Ashok Kumar Khemka (File)

Hearing a quashing petition filed by one of the accused in the FIR registered by Panchkula Police on a complaint lodged by senior Haryana IAS officer Ashok Kumar Khemka, the Punjab and Haryana High Court on Wednesday – while issuing notice to the state of Haryana – directed that the investigation into the FIR may continue, but the investigating officer (IO) concerned may not not file the chargesheet without permission of the HC.

The HC was hearing the petition filed by Ravinder Kumar seeking quashing of the FIR filed against him following a complaint by Ashok Khemka.

Another Haryana IAS officer Sanjeev Verma, Managing Director of the Haryana State Warehousing Corporation (HSWC), is also an accused in this case along with Ravinder.

Story continues below this ad

Panchkula Police had booked Verma, Kumar and others on charges of criminal conspiracy and fabrication of official documents on the complaint lodged by Khemka.

Incidentally, the FIR against Verma and Kumar (FIR No. 171 at Sector 5 police station, Panchkula) was registered just about an hour after Panchkula Police booked Khemka and three retired employees of HSWC under provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act (FIR No. 170).

Verma, the incumbent MD of HSWC, had made a complaint filed by Kumar the basis to seek an FIR against Khemka, a 1991-batch IAS officer.

As the matter came up for hearing on Wednesday, the counsel for Kumar, Senior Advocate Rajesh Garg with Neha Matharoo, contended that the impugned FIR was a complete abuse of the process of law, and it was lodged with malicious intent.

Story continues below this ad

Referring to Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Kumar contended it was only on the complaint of a public servant (the investigating officer of the earlier FIR) that proceedings under Sections l67, I82, I95A, 198, 211 and 218 could be initiated. It could be done only after the completion of investigation and arriving at the conclusion that the complaint (earlier FIR) was false and was made deliberately by the complainant (Khemka).

The bench of Justice Sureshwar Thakur, after hearing the matter, issued notice to the state of Haryana. The HC permitted the state counsel to file reply and status report within three weeks.

Justice Thakur ordered, “The investigation into the FIR may continue, but the investigating officer concerned, may not, except with the leave of this court, institute a report under Section 173 of the CrPC before the learned Magistrate concerned.”

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement