skip to content
Advertisement
Premium

Cash At Judge’s Door: 17 years later, final arguments conclude, verdict on March 29

The case dates back to August 13, 2008, when a clerk at the residence of Justice Kaur received a packet containing Rs 15 lakh in cash.

Justice Nirmal Yadav, Justice Nirmal Yadav cash case, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Justice Nirmaljit Kaur, Indian express news, current affairsThe court of Special CBI Judge Alka Malik Thursday heard the final arguments in case registered against Justice Yadav by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and posted the case for pronouncement of decision on March 29.

A Chandigarh court will on Saturday (March 29) pronounce its verdict in a case involving Justice Nirmal Yadav, then a sitting judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, wherein a packet containing Rs 15 lakh in cash and allegedly meant for her, was delivered at the residence of another judge — Justice Nirmaljit Kaur — in August 2008.

The court of Special CBI Judge Alka Malik Thursday heard the final arguments in case registered against Justice Yadav by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and posted the case for pronouncement of decision on March 29.

“I have not committed any crime and there is nothing incriminating found during the entire trial against me,” Justice Yadav (retd) said in her final statement.

Story continues below this ad

The case dates back to August 13, 2008, when a clerk at the residence of Justice Kaur received a packet containing Rs 15 lakh in cash. The packet was allegedly meant for Justice Yadav and was delivered at the other judge’s residence over a mistaken identity due to their similar sounding names.

Justice Kaur informed the then Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court and the Chandigarh Police, following which a First Information Report (FIR) was registered on August 16, 2008. However, 10 days later, the then UT Administrator, General (retd) SF Rodrigues, transferred the the case to the CBI, which registered a fresh FIR on August 28, 2008.

During the probe, it came to fore that the money was delivered by a clerk of former Haryana Additional Advocate General Sanjeev Bansal, who had also called Justice Kaur stating that the money was actually meant for one Nirmal Singh but had mistakenly reached her residence.

The CBI in January 2009, sought sanction to prosecute Justice Yadav. The high court granted the same in November 2010. Justice Yadav challenged CBI’s move but was unsuccessful. The office of the President of India approved the prosecution sanction in March 2011, following which CBI filed a chargesheet the same month.

Story continues below this ad

During the course of the trial, the prosecution cited 84 witnesses but only 69 were examined. The high court, in February this, year allowed the CBI to re-examine 10 witnesses within four weeks and further asked the trial court to ensure that no unnecessary adjournments are granted.

 

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement

You May Like

Advertisement
Advertisement