Premium
This is an archive article published on July 21, 2022

Teesta, Sreekumar bail plea: Court reserves orders for next week

Setalvad and Sreekumar were arrested last month by the Ahmedabad Detection of Crime Branch while former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt was arrested earlier this month for allegedly fabricating evidence to frame innocent persons in the 2002 riots cases.

Teesta Setalvad, Teesta Setalvad case, R B Sreekumar, R B Sreekumar case, Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad news, Gujarat, Gujarat news, Indian Express, India news, current affairs, Indian Express News Service, Express News Service, Express News, Indian Express India NewsThe prosecution has broadly canvassed arguments on Setalvad’s past conduct.

An Ahmedabad sessions court Thursday reserved orders for next week on the regular bail pleas of Mumbai-activist Teesta Setalvad and retired DGP RB Sreekumar, following conclusion of all arguments by the prosecution and defence on the pleas.

The prosecution, through public prosecutor Mitesh Amin, closed its argument, emphasising that at this stage when chargesheet has not been filed, going by the “conduct” of Setalvad and Sreekumar, “only endeavour is for protecting investigation,” so as to ascertain “what is their role, what is the actual benefit they (accused) got from various persons,” adding that these aspects cannot be found out “unless investigation is protected, witnesses are protected.”

Setalvad and Sreekumar were arrested last month by the Ahmedabad Detection of Crime Branch while former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt was arrested earlier this month for allegedly fabricating evidence to frame innocent persons in the 2002 riots cases.

Story continues below this ad

While opposing the bail pleas of Setalvad and Sreekumar, the prosecution so far has largely indicated at the “larger conspiracy” that was allegedly orchestrated by Setalvad and the two co-accused with the motive “to destabilise the government”, and the prosecution has ascribed that Setalvad did this in order to “become a Rajya Sabha member and other monetary gains”.

The prosecution has broadly canvassed arguments on Setalvad’s past conduct.

Meanwhile, rebutting the prosecution’s argument on her conduct, advocate Somnath Vatsa, representing Setalvad, argued Thursday that Setalvad choosing to “exercise her legal right” cannot be used to draw “adverse comment”, and also argued that so far ingredients of IPC section 192 (fabricating false evidence) is not made out and without ingredients of key offences, the prosecution cannot stress on the offence of “a larger conspiracy”.

Vatsa also added that while there is no doubt that investigation has to be fair, at the same time “it cannot mean pre-trial incarceration.

Story continues below this ad

Sreekumar’s advocate S M Vora as well as Vatsa, both argued Thursday on the past conduct and precedents  of one of the said witness cited by the prosecution, that the defence suspects is Raiskhan Pathan, now a Central Waqf Council member, who was associated with Setalvad and her NGO Citizens for Justice and Peace, as a field coordinator in Ahmedabad.

Newsletter | Click to get the day’s best explainers in your inbox

Highlighting his contentious conduct in the past, including a trial court conducting the Naroda Patiya riots case charging Pathan for fabricating evidence along with Setalvad, it was pointed out by Vora that Pathan is a disgruntled ex-employee of CJP and in his latest statements as witness has named only dead people like deceased Congress MP Ahmed Patel and father of Gujarat minister and BJP MLA late Haren Pandya, Vithalbhai Pandya.

It was also Vora’s case that Sreekumar retired in April 2007 and incidents cited by the investigators in the present case of Sreekumar allegedly pressuring witnesses to work with Setalvad, occurred in 2010.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement

You May Like

Advertisement