Premium
This is an archive article published on November 10, 2009

SIT questions ex-minister I K Jadeja in connection with 2002 riots

The Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team on Monday questioned former Gujarat minister and BJP leader I K Jadeja for his alleged role in the 2002 riots.

The Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) on Monday questioned former Gujarat minister and BJP leader I K Jadeja for his alleged role in the 2002 riots.

Jadeja,the then Urban Development Minister,was questioned for two hours in connection with the SIT’s ongoing probe into the role,if any,of Chief Minister Narendra Modi,his cabinet and others in connection with the mayhem that officially left 1,180 people dead.

Former CBI Deputy Inspector General A K Malhotra was the only officer who questioned Jadeja,said sources.

Story continues below this ad

Jadeja,while exiting the SIT office,said: “I have answered all that they asked me and have nothing to comment.”

The SIT had begun the probe this May,following the Supreme Court’s order in connection to a petition filed by Zakia Jafri,the widow of former Congress MP Ehsan Jafri,around mid-2006.

Jafri’s statements in connection to her petition were recorded on May 26. Former Gujarat Home Minister Gordhan Zadapia was called to the SIT office four times this September in connection with the petition.

Quoting from the affidavit of retired Director General of Police R B Sreekumar before the Justice Nanavati-Mehta Commission,para 50 of the petition accuses Jadeja of adversely affecting the supervision of the riots’ situation by giving verbal orders to officers from the then DGP’s office.

Story continues below this ad

“Chakravarthy (the then DGP),was quite critical about the presence of a cabinet minister,I K Jadeja,in the DGP’s office in the days after the Godhra incident. The DGP remonstratively bemoaned that the presence of the minister was adversely affecting the supervision of the situation. He added that officers at the cutting edge level in the field were carrying out the verbal orders of the ruling party leaders instead of the directions of the jurisdictional officers.”

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement

You May Like

Advertisement