Journalism of Courage

2 J-K govt school teachers accused of ‘radicalising youth, working for LeT’, terminated from service

Citing ‘threat to security of State’, both were sacked by the Lt Governor under Article 311(2)(C) of the Constitution without inquiry, raising the number of govt employees terminated in similar fashion in J-K since 2021 to 84

Jammu and Kashmir, Jammu and Kashmir political tension, L-G Manoj Sinha controversy, Manoj Sinha, National Conference protest, Deputy CM Surinder Choudhary, Manoj Sinha proxy government allegations, statehood demand J&K, J&K governance issues, Indian expressJammu and Kashmir Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha. (Express Photo)
Advertisement

Two government school teachers in Jammu and Kashmir were on Thursday terminated from service for allegedly being “a threat to the security of the State”.

J&K Lt Governor Manoj Sinha’s administration ordered the termination of the two teachers, both from the Jammu region, under Article 311(2)(C) of the Constitution, which allows for the termination of government employees without an inquiry if the President or Governor is satisfied that such action is necessary in the interest of the security of the State.

With this, the total number of government employees terminated from service in J&K under Article 311(2)(C) since 2021 has risen to 84. This is also the third time that the Lt Governor has ordered the termination of government employees since Chief Minister Omar Abdullah’s elected government took office in October last year.

The two men terminated from service on Thursday are Maajid Iqbal Dar and Gh Hussain, both teachers employed by the School Education Department. While Dar is a resident of Kheora in Rajouri, Hussain is from Kalwa Mullas village of Mahore in Reasi district of Jammu region.

“…the Lieutenant Governor is satisfied after considering the facts and circumstances of the case and on the basis of the information available, that the activities of Maajid Iqbal Dar…are such as to warrant his dismissal from service,” read the termination order against Dar, which also said that the “Lieutenant Governor is satisfied under sub-clause (c) of the proviso to clause (2) of Article 311 of the Constitution of India that in the interest of the security of the State, it is not expedient to hold an enquiry in the case of Maajid Iqbal Dar.”

The dismissal order was issued by the Commissioner Secretary to the Government, General Administration Department.

Sources said Dar was jailed for his alleged involvement in “narco-terrorism, terror financing and radicalisation of youth in Rajouri”. They also said that he was linked to various “subversive activities, despite being in jail”.

Story continues below this ad

In a separate, but similar order, the Lt Governor ordered the termination of Gh Hussain.

Police have accused Hussain of being an “overground worker of Lashkar-e-Toiba” and of helping them to “facilitate recruitment and funding”.

Article 311(2)(C) of the Constitution allows the government to terminate an employee without ordering an inquiry or giving them a chance to explain their position. With the majority of employees terminated in this manner being from Kashmir, political parties in the Valley have criticised the “arbitrary terminations”, alleging that they are attempts to “disempower” Kashmiris.

From the homepage

Bashaarat Masood is a Special Correspondent with The Indian Express. He has been covering Jammu and Kashmir, especially the conflict-ridden Kashmir valley, for two decades. Bashaarat joined The Indian Express after completing his Masters in Mass Communication and Journalism from the University in Kashmir. He has been writing on politics, conflict and development. Bashaarat was awarded with the Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Awards in 2012 for his stories on the Pathribal fake encounter. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
  • Jammu and Kashmir
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
'Free for a day'Acquitted after 43 years, Indian-origin man faces deportation – to a country he has never known
X