Charlie Kirk Assassination LIVE Updates: Graphic video of Kirk shooting was everywhere online, showing how media gatekeeper role has changed
They were careful with explicit imagery, as usual. But did it make any difference?
Traditional news outlets avoided showing the moment Charlie Kirk was shot on Wednesday, instead airing video of him tossing a hat to the crowd beforehand or panicked onlookers fleeing afterwards. In practice, it mattered little. Graphic footage spread almost instantly online, from multiple angles, in real time and slow motion. Millions watched on X, Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, YouTube — and even Truth Social, where Donald Trump announced Kirk’s death.
Kirk was shot at a Utah college event before hundreds of people, many holding up phones. Clips showed the exact moment of the shooting: one looped in slow motion, another caught the audio of Kirk apparently speaking about gun violence as he was struck. For more than 150 years, legacy outlets have acted as “gatekeepers” of violent content. But in the age of smartphones and instant uploads, their editorial restraint has far less impact.
In Ithaca, New York, college professor Sarah Kreps’ teenage sons texted her about the killing after school. She told them Kirk had been shot but there were no reports of his death. Her son replied: “Have you seen the video? There’s no way he could have survived that.” Clips spread at lightning speed. Some users pleaded for restraint. “For the love of God and Charlie’s family,” read one post, “just stop.” Others reposted the footage while urging “stop the violence.”
YouTube said it was removing “some graphic content” without context and restricting others for users under 18. “Our hearts are with Charlie Kirk's family following his tragic death,” it said. Meta applied warning labels but did not block such posts, referring to its policies on violent content. An X spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment.
The issue is not new. Facebook faced backlash in 2019 when people attempted to livestream a mass shooting in New Zealand, Kreps noted. Some images seeped into mainstream media. TMZ posted a video of Kirk with his upper body blurred. The New York Post did the same. Editors say restraint still matters. Viewers may choose to click on disturbing images online, but stumbling across them without warning is different. “The traditional media can amplify and validate behavior,” Kreps said. “It can be a signal for how things should be stigmatised, rather than validated or normalised.”
(With inputs from AP)