Journalism of Courage
Advertisement

Karnataka HC sets aside suspension of Legislative Council official over missing Ambedkar portrait on Constitution Day

K J Jalajakshi, a Deputy Secretary of the Legislative Council, was suspended in July this year, after which she challenged the suspension order before the Karnataka High Court.

2 min read
Ambedkar Five, BookThe case pertains to a complaint lodged after the portrait of Dr B R Ambedkar was not displayed during the Constitution Day function held on November 26 last year.

The Karnataka High Court has set aside the suspension of an official of the Legislative Council who had allegedly failed to place the portrait of Dr B R Ambedkar on the occasion of Constitution Day last year.

The bench of Justice H T Narendra Prasad passed the order, which was recently made public, on August 19. The court observed, “….considering that the suspension order was issued after a lapse of seven months from the date of the incident, coupled with the fact that a departmental inquiry has already been initiated against the petitioner, continued suspension of the petitioner would serve no useful purpose.”

The case pertains to a complaint lodged after the portrait of Dr B R Ambedkar was not displayed during the Constitution Day function held on November 26 last year. Based on this, K J Jalajakshi, a Deputy Secretary of the Legislative Council, was suspended in July this year, after which she challenged the suspension order before the high court.

Jalajakshi’s counsel argued that she was not the organising authority for the function, and she had not directed any officer not to place the portrait. The counsel also pointed out that as per the petitioner’s previous reply to a notice in March, all employees who received a circular regarding the placement of the portrait would be responsible, but action was only taken against her.

It was also argued that an employee ought to be suspended only where there is a strong prima facie case which would result in dismissal or reduction of rank. But even if the case was proved here, only a minor penalty could be imposed.

Noting that it was “equally incumbent upon other employees” as well to have ensured compliance with the instructions in the circular, the court said, “The only contention of the petitioner is that she is not the authority either to organize or to oversee the function…”.

Setting aside the suspension order, the court directed the departmental enquiry against the officer to be completed in accordance with the law.

From the homepage

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Express PremiumIn GST 2.0 calculus, behavioural nudges — packaged foods to ACs
X