The Devil on Trial movie review: Sloppy Netflix documentary exposes real-life sham behind the Conjuring films
The Devil on Trial movie review: A retelling of the real incidents that inspired The Conjuring 3, Netflix's new documentary takes a straight-faced approach to a silly story.
Listen to this articleYour browser does not support the audio element.
“My name is David Glatzel. When I was 11, I was possessed by the devil.” Opening lines don’t get better than this, but it’s a pity that Netflix’s The Devil on Trial isn’t able to live up to their promise. A retelling of the real-life events that inspired the third Conjuring film — a week from now, Apple will release a similar project about the true story behind the second Conjuring — the film is a slapdash, surface-level examination of a truly fascinating modern American tragedy.
When the 11-year-old David began displaying erratic behaviour in the year 1980, his seemingly regular family decided that it must be the doing of the devil. David’s mother summoned the infamous demonologist duo Ed and Lorraine Warren, who had the unique knack of becoming associated with that era’s most talked-about paranormal stories, including the Amityville haunting, the Annabelle curse, and the Enfield poltergeist. Based on their own five-step metre to gauge such incidents — permission, infestation, oppression, possession, destruction — the Warrens estimated that David was already on step three.
You have exhausted your monthly limit of free stories.
Read more stories for free with an Express account.
They reached out to their associates in the Catholic Church, and after filling out the necessary paperwork — who knew that expunging your soul of demons required you to briefly turn into Mussadi Lal — arranged for a ‘minor’ exorcism to be performed on David. During the ritual, a family friend invited the devil to try him on for size and leave the boy alone, a twist that even the seasoned Warrens weren’t prepared for. They declared that it was absolutely the wrong thing to do, seeing as it violated step one of their guidelines: permission. The family friend, David’s sister’s boyfriend Arne, appeared unaffected in the moment, but would later murder an acquaintance in cold blood. His trial became known as the “Devil Made Me Do It” case, because it was the first known court case in America in which demonic possession was used as a defence.
It’s all malarkey, of course. And the movie knows it, which is why it’s so strange for it to pretend otherwise for a full hour. Director Chris Holt rounds up the remaining members of the Glatzer family, including David and his two estranged brothers, the convict Arne, the detective who investigated the murder, and a random priest who appears to have changed divine allegiances over the years. But he takes a unidimensional approach to a story that is practically begging for a more careful telling.
We don’t get a sense of the kind of life David leads now; the film literally chains him for over an hour to an unchanging backdrop plastered with a dozen or so crucifixes. His younger brother Alan pops by to corroborate the claims, while Arne (who didn’t actually get away with it, mind you) nods along as they recall traumatic past memories. The Devil on Trial intersperses these talking head portions with real audio recordings of David’s possession, and the many Polaroid stills that his sister took of him during it. But their intended effect wears off within minutes.
Eons after you’ve probably given up all hope, the film finally presents a counterargument to the shared psychosis that it was subjecting you to for so long. It wouldn’t make sense to talk about what happens here, seeing as how this is the only worthwhile stretch in the movie. But let’s just say that The Devil on Trial is able to confront a truth that the Conjuring movies have been wilfully turning a blind eye to for a decade. Being terrible horror movies is the least of their crimes; the Conjuring films are actually propagating (and making a financial contribution to) the legacy of some rather duplicitous people.
But just because The Devil on Trial is aware of the larger context around these incidents doesn’t absolve it of trying to milk them for more ‘content’. A better filmmaker would’ve immediately sensed that this, in its current form, isn’t the real story at all. But The Devil on Trial is satisfied being a standard Netflix shock-doc that Holt has somehow managed to condense down to an hour and 20 minutes. This, more than anything else, is the most shocking thing about the film, because we all know that the streamer has the truly remarkable ability to stretch even a TikTok into a multi-episode miniseries if it wants to.
The Devil on Trial Director – Christopher Holt Rating – 2/5
Rohan Naahar is an assistant editor at Indian Express online. He covers pop-culture across formats and mediums. He is a 'Rotten Tomatoes-approved' critic and a member of the Film Critics Guild of India. He previously worked with the Hindustan Times, where he wrote hundreds of film and television reviews, produced videos, and interviewed the biggest names in Indian and international cinema. At the Express, he writes a column titled Post Credits Scene, and has hosted a podcast called Movie Police.
You can find him on X at @RohanNaahar, and write to him at rohan.naahar@indianexpress.com. He is also on LinkedIn and Instagram. ... Read More