Journalism of Courage
Premium

Union of Hindu woman, Muslim man invalid under Muslim personal law even if registered under Special Marriage Act: Madhya Pradesh HC

A Hindu woman and a Muslim man had approached the High Court, through their counsel Dinesh Kumar Upadhayay, seeking police protection to appear before a marriage officer under the Special Marriage Act to get their marriage registered.

marriage courtJustice Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia said that a marriage between a Muslim man and a Hindu woman would be treated as an “irregular (fasid) marriage” under Muslim personal law even if they married under the Special Marriage Act. File photo
Advertisement

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has observed that a marriage between a Muslim man and a Hindu woman is not valid under Muslim personal law. The court made the observation as it turned down a plea by a couple seeking police protection to register an inter-faith marriage under the Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Justice Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia said that a marriage between a Muslim man and a Hindu woman would be treated as an “irregular (fasid) marriage” under Muslim personal law even if they married under the Special Marriage Act.

“As per Mahomedan law, the marriage of a Muslim boy with a girl who is an idolatress, or a fire-worshipper, is not a valid marriage. Even if the marriage is registered under the Special Marriage Act, the marriage would be no more a valid marriage, and it would be an irregular (fasid) marriage.” the court said in its May 27 order.

A Hindu woman and a Muslim man had approached the High Court, through their counsel Dinesh Kumar Upadhayay, seeking police protection to appear before a marriage officer under the Special Marriage Act to get their marriage registered.

They did this after the woman’s family opposed their relationship and claimed that the woman had taken jewellery from the family house when leaving to marry her partner.

Upadhayay told the court that neither the woman nor the man wished to convert. He contended that even though a marriage between them would be prohibited under personal law, it would be valid under the Special Marriage Act. The Special Marriage Act would override the personal law, he argued.

However, the court said “marriage under Special Marriage Act would not legalise the marriage which otherwise is prohibited under personal law”. “Section 4 of the Special Marriage Act provides that if the parties are not in a prohibited relationship, then only marriage can be performed,” the court said.

Story continues below this ad

The court proceeded to dismiss the couple’s petition after noting that they were neither willing to be in a live-in relationship without being married, nor was the woman willing to convert to the man’s religion.

“Under these circumstances, this court is of the considered opinion that no case is made out warranting interference,” the High Court said.

Curated For You

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
  • Special Marriage Act
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Express ExplainedWho was Major Mohit Sharma, why his family claims 'Dhurandhar' is based on him
X