Curtains on old IPC, CrPC, Evidence law, new criminal codes come into effect from today
While the IPC, CrPC and Evidence Act will continue to operate for all offences committed before July 1 for all stages of litigation, the new Sanhitas will apply for offences committed after the gazette notification kicks in.
Old laws to apply to all offences before July 1 at all stages of litigation.
Advertisement
Effective Monday, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam will replace the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
Together, these three laws govern the criminal justice jurisprudence — from defining penal offences, prescribing processes for investigation and evidence gathering to governing the process of a trial in court.
You have exhausted your monthly limit of free stories.
Read more stories for free with an Express account.
Among the key changes will be the introduction of new offences in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) — from making a deceitful promise to marry (up to 10 years in jail); ‘mob lynching’ on the ground of race, caste or community, sex… (life sentence or death penalty); snatching (up to 3 years in jail) to bringing in stringent anti-terror, organised crimes under its ambit.
Under the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), the law extends detention in police custody from the current 15-day limit under the CrPC to up to 90 days. This prolonged pre-trial detention for ordinary penal offences has raised concerns about personal liberty.
While the IPC, CrPC and Evidence Act will continue to operate for all offences committed before July 1 for all stages of litigation, the new Sanhitas will apply for offences committed after the gazette notification kicks in.
The three laws were passed by Parliament in December through a voice vote in both Houses when many Opposition MPs were under suspension.
A week before the laws were to be rolled out, two Chief Ministers of Opposition-ruled states – Mamata Banerjee of West Bengal and M K Stalin of Tamil Nadu – had written to Union Home Minister Amit Shah, seeking to defer the implementation of the laws.
Karnataka and Tamil Nadu, objecting to the titles of the laws, cited Article 348 of the Constitution which states that legislations introduced in Parliament must be in English.
Karnataka has also raised concerns over some of the key provisions – from allowing a police officer 14 days for a preliminarily investigation before registering an FIR and the total exclusion of Section 377 of the IPC which is invoked now in cases of sexual assault of a man.
In preparation for the new laws, the Uttar Pradesh government on June 25 approved the proposal to bring an ordinance to make some exceptions in the anticipatory bail provisions and bring state amendments to a host of public security laws including the UP Gangsters and Anti-social activities (Prevention) Act, 1986; the UP Control of Goondas Act, 1970; the UP Recovery of Damages to Public and Private Property Act, 2020; the UP Dacoity Affected Areas Act, 1983; the UP Special Security Force Act, 2020; and UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021.
The MHA also issued a gazette notification for all Union Territories, assigning the powers granted to the states under the three news laws, to the Lieutenant Governors for “better discharge of duties”.
Apurva Vishwanath is the National Legal Editor of The Indian Express in New Delhi. She graduated with a B.A., LL. B (Hons) from Dr Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow. She joined the newspaper in 2019 and in her current role, oversees the newspapers coverage of legal issues. She also closely tracks judicial appointments. Prior to her role at the Indian Express, she has worked with ThePrint and Mint. ... Read More