Journalism of Courage
Advertisement
Premium

How Trump-Musk break-up can severely affect NASA and its future space missions

Musk’s threat to decommission the Dragon spacecraft revealed the vulnerability of NASA which is now dependent on private companies for many critical systems in the space programme

Musk TrumpUS President Donald Trump and Elon Musk in November 2024. (Photo: AP)
America’s ambitious space plans for the coming years could become one of the biggest casualties of the sudden and dramatic falling out of US President Donald Trump and the world’s richest person Elon Musk. In the last few years, US space agency NASA has created such a big dependency on Musk’s company SpaceX that a decoupling would inevitably turn the clock back on NASA’s plans by several years.
It could also seriously jeopardise space missions like the one being executed by Axiom Space, a private US company, next week. This mission, Axiom-4, is carrying four astronauts, including India’s Shubhanshu Shukla, to the International Space Station. The astronauts will travel in a Crew Dragon spacecraft built by SpaceX. The rocket to be used for launch, Falcon 9, is also from SpaceX. The mission is being operated by Axiom Space, but has been enabled by NASA through its ongoing attempts to build space capabilities in the private sector.

Musk and Trump are engaged in a bitter war of words on social media, triggered by Musk’s strong criticism of a Congressional tax Bill that he claims will result in a massive increase in the national debt. Trump has hit back saying Musk was concerned about the bill’s provisions relating to tax credits on electric vehicles (EVs), which could adversely affect Tesla, the EV company of Musk.

Trump went on to say that the easiest way to save government money — “billions and billions of dollars” — was to terminate government contracts and subsidies for Musk’s companies. Musk retorted that in the light of the President’s statement, SpaceX would begin decommissioning of its Dragon spacecraft “immediately”. He relented a few hours later, saying the decommissioning won’t happen.

The incident might have cooled down for now, but Musk’s threat to decommission the Dragon spacecraft revealed the vulnerability of NASA which is now dependent on private companies for many critical systems in the space programme. Much of it has been actively encouraged by NASA to create a vibrant public-private space ecosystem that allows it to focus mainly on more ambitious planetary exploration activities while leaving the more routine and mundane jobs like transportation to private companies.

NASA’s reliance on SpaceX

The Crew Dragon spacecraft of SpaceX is currently the only reliable vehicle that NASA has to transport astronauts to and from the ISS, a permanent laboratory in space, about 400 km from Earth, that is manned throughout the year. The ISS is used mainly by astronauts from the US and Russia, but occasionally those from other countries also make short visits, just like Shukla’s crew would be doing next week.

The astronauts on ISS are typically changed twice a year. In addition, three to four cargo missions are also sent to the ISS every year. Russian astronauts typically travel in the Soyuz spacecraft built by the Russian agency Roscosmos.

But NASA has discontinued its space shuttle programme, which included vehicles such as Atlantis, Discovery or Endeavour, primarily on cost considerations. The last NASA space shuttle mission was flown in Atlantis in 2011. These space shuttles used to be launched by NASA’s own rockets. The discontinuation of the space shuttle programme stopped the production of these rockets as well.

Story continues below this ad

Between 2011 and 2020, NASA used the Russian transport, Soyuz, for travel to the ISS. After that, it has been hiring SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft, which launches exclusively on the Falcon 9 rocket, also of SpaceX.

NASA has also contracted other companies, notably Boeing, to transport astronauts and cargo to the ISS. Boeing’s Starliner has carried out a few cargo sorties but its first crewed mission, carrying Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore, last year was a troubled one. The Starliner, which uses Boeing’s Atlas rockets to launch, managed to drop the astronauts at the ISS, but was rendered risky for a return journey due to a technical glitch. The two astronauts were stranded at the ISS for nine months before a SpaceX mission brought them back in February this year.

The ISS missions are only one part of NASA’s increasing reliance on SpaceX. Musk’s company, which started in 2006 and has grown to become the largest private space corporation, is heavily involved with the Artemis programme as well, the ambitious NASA plan to get humans back to the Moon, this time for extended periods of time. The crewed missions under the Artemis programme are expected to use the Starship spacecraft of SpaceX. The first of the crewed missions is scheduled for 2027.

Extra-planetary exploration missions, like those to Saturn, are also being done in collaboration with SpaceX. In many segments, SpaceX has developed superior technologies that have increased NASA’s dependence on it.

Story continues below this ad

SpaceX has also created a constellation of satellites to provide Internet services around the world. NASA is not linked to this network, but some other US government agencies are, creating dependencies elsewhere too. A Reuters report said SpaceX had about $22 billion worth of government contracts, across different agencies. The contract to transport astronauts to the ISS on the Dragon spacecraft was alone worth about $5 billion, it said.

Feud not over

Musk may have tried to avoid an immediate crisis, but the feud can escalate any time. Trump has been unrelenting on the issue of continued tax concessions for EVs, even when Musk supposedly was a close friend. Now that Musk has opened a public battle, making personal attacks, the possibility of Trump suspending government contracts of Musk’s companies, as he suggested in one of his social media posts, cannot be ruled out.
If that happens, the implications for NASA, and America’s space programme, is going to be huge. The Artemis programme would almost certainly be pushed back, and the schedule for ISS would get badly affected. It might force NASA to scale back its involvement with other private players as well, and go back to more in-house production of space systems.
Trump might not be particularly worried about the impact on NASA from a potential disengagement by SpaceX. He hasn’t exactly been a champion of NASA’s programmes. The space agency is already having a tough time under his Presidency, with prospects of big budget cuts, reduction of workforce, and shutting down of some of its offices.
Tags:
  • Explained Sci-Tech Express Explained Express Premium
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Express Premium‘Delhi is nearer now’: Rajdhani's arrival puts Aizawl on Indian Railways' map
X