Journalism of Courage
Advertisement
Premium

Road to 2024: As Yediyurappa is phased out, another regional satrap shrinks in BJP, frames its pre-poll challenge

BJP was once known for prominent faces at every level of the organisation, who rose to become stars; now, the space overwhelmingly dominated by Narendra Modi and Amit Shah is too restrictive for many others

bsyIn 2012, as the star of both Advani and Vajpayee was on the decline, and Modi was emerging over the horizon, Yediyurappa's decision to leave the BJP is believed to have played a major role in the party's Karnataka loss. (Twitter/@BSYBJP)
Listen to this article Your browser does not support the audio element.

As it seeks to hold on to power in Karnataka, the absence of a charismatic and popularly accepted leader is proving to be the BJP’s biggest hurdle, raising old concerns regarding the new party dispensation not having a space to give strong second-rung leaders their due.

Once, the BJP stood out among parties for prominent faces at every level of the organisation. L K Advani, who was the BJP president in 1986-1991, 1993-1998 and 2004-2005, was credited with having cultivated a battery of young leaders, who all rose to important positions.

In the early 2000s, when the Atal Bihari Vajpayee-led coalition government was in power, many of these leaders were the party’s stars in both Houses of Parliament – including Rajnath Singh (Uttar Pradesh); Pramod Mahajan (a favourite of Vajpayee’s); Arun Jaitley (the eloquent legal mind, if not popular ground-level leader, who extricated the party out of many a situation, particularly with the Opposition); Sushma Swaraj (among its tallest women leaders); and M Venkaiah Naidu (the face from the south).

Other national leaders identified by Advani were Uma Bharti (a good orator and OBC leader) and Shahnawaz Hussain (the BJP’s minority face).

Apart from them, Advani-led BJP groomed Vasundhara Raje (Rajasthan), Shivraj Singh Chouhan (Madhya Pradesh), Raman Singh (Chhattisgarh), Manohar Parrikar (Goa), and Narendra Modi (Gujarat), who became powerful regional satraps in their respective states.

This constellation of leaders was also seen as reflective of a significant social engineering exercise, with a mix of upper castes, backwards, hardcore Hindutva advocates and moderate faces.

Among them, B S Yediyurappa, who brought the BJP to power for the first time in south India in 2008, was an exception, as he did not enjoy a good rapport with Advani, though Vajpayee promoted him.

Story continues below this ad

In 2012, as the star of both Advani and Vajpayee was on the decline, and Modi was emerging over the horizon, Yediyurappa’s decision to leave the BJP is believed to have played a major role in the party’s Karnataka loss.

Since then, Modi and Amit Shah’s tightening of control on the BJP has seen many regional satraps yielding to the high command – quite like in the Congress, for example. In Karnataka, the party officially ushered in the beginning of the end of the Yediyurappa era when in 2021 he was removed as CM despite his obvious reluctance.

Ironically, it is he again who is shouldering the burden of the BJP campaign in its campaign to win back Karnataka.

To be sure, after leading the party to a massive victory in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, the Modi-Shah leadership did try to groom a new leadership at first, but in going about this, pointedly, by sidelining leaders of dominant local community groups, it was seen as cutting old hands to size, to build up others.

Story continues below this ad

For example, its choice of non-tribal Raghubar Das as CM for Jharkhand, non-Jat Manohar Lal Khattar as CM for Haryana and non-Maratha Devendra Fadnavis as CM for Maharashtra. But this was a gamble, with as many hits as misses. If the above three remain largely state-specific leaders, Yogi Adityanath in Uttar Pradesh and lateral entry Himanta Biswa Sarma in Assam are now national names. In Uttarakhand, Pushkar Singh Dhami is seen as a rising star.

The Congress too once had a line of leaders who could hold their own against the high command – Digvijaya Singh in Madhya Pradesh, Ashok Gehlot in Rajasthan, K Karunakaran and Oommen Chandy in Kerala, and Sharad Pawar in Maharashtra. The dwindling of the clout of most of them coincided with the party’s own sliding fortunes.

As party workers themselves admit, the Congress wins now are more about strong state units. Hence, the importance of Gehlot in Rajasthan, and Siddaramaiah now, the Congress’s biggest weapon in Karnataka.

With 73 new faces in its list for Karnataka polls, the BJP is ostensibly aiming for a generation change, readjustment of its caste umbrella, to stretch it beyond its outsized Lingayat share, and countering anti-incumbency. The 2018 list might still have Lingayats in larger numbers than others, but the post-Yediyurappa phase in the BJP has begun.

Story continues below this ad

As part of this, party sources say, the caste distribution in every district was done more carefully this time.

However, the jury is out on whether it will prove enough for the BJP, and make up for the attempt in part to play down Hindutva and focus on development. The results will be for all to see on May 13.

Have been in journalism covering national politics for 23 years. Have covered six consecutive Lok Sabha elections and assembly polls in almost all the states. Currently writes on ruling BJP. Always loves to understand what's cooking in the national politics (And ventures into the act only in kitchen at home).  ... Read More

Tags:
  • Express Premium road to 2024
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Capital ColumnAs Rahul goes down ‘H-bomb’ path, murmurs in Congress: What would be the fallout radius?
X