Farmer protests: AG says talks may work, SC defers hearing
Talks between the Centre and farmer unions opposed to the new laws are to resume Friday over two key demands — repeal of the laws and provision of legal guarantee on the minimum support price.
The Attorney General too submitted that since negotiations are on, a government reply to petitions against the laws might foreclose the talks.
Advertisement
Noting that there is “no improvement” in the situation precipitated by differences between the Centre and sections of the farming community over the newly enacted agriculture laws, the Supreme Court agreed Wednesday to hear petitions challenging the new laws and those against the ongoing protests on January 11.
A bench of Chief Justice of India S A Bobde, Justices A S Bopanna and V Ramasubra-manian fixed the matter for next week after Attorney General K K Venugopal informed the court that “there are chances of the parties coming to some sort of an understanding”.
You have exhausted your monthly limit of free stories.
Read more stories for free with an Express account.
Talks between the Centre and farmer unions opposed to the new laws are to resume Friday over two key demands — repeal of the laws and provision of legal guarantee on the minimum support price.
The bench was hearing a plea by advocate M L Sharma, challenging the laws.
It was initially inclined to schedule the next hearing on January 8. But Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said, “We are having a healthy discussion” and urged the court to post the matter to a different date.
The Attorney General too submitted that since negotiations are on, a government reply to petitions against the laws might foreclose the talks.
“We understand the situation and encourage the consultation,” the bench remarked and said it will adjourn the matter on January 11 as well if needed inthe interest of the consultation process.
Story continues below this ad
The bench, which issued notice on Sharma’s plea, is dealing with a clutch of petitions challenging the farm laws and some against the ongoing protests at Delhi’s borders.
Others who have challenged the farm laws include RJD Rajya Sabha member Manoj Jha, DMK Rajya Sabha member Tiruchi Siva, and some residents of Chhattisgarh.
The court has already issued notice on these pleas which raise the grievance that the laws act against the interest of farmers and put them at the mercy of corporates by dismantling the Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMC) mechanism.
A plea against the protests was filed by law student Rishabh Sharma who cited the Covid-19 situation and hardship caused to commuters and patients in need of emergency health care.
Story continues below this ad
Last month, the bench expressed its intention to form a committee comprising members of farmer associations and the government to carry forward the talks. It also allowed farmer groups to implead in the matter.
Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry.
He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More