Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

A Delhi court Thursday sought an action taken report (ATR) from the police on a plea filed against Sudarshan TV Editor-in-Chief Suresh Chavhanke for allegedly delivering communally divisive speeches at an event in southeast Delhiâs Govindpuri area.
The application was filed by Dr SQR Illiyas, president of the Welfare Party of India. His son, former JNU student Umar Khalid, is currently in judicial custody in a UAPA case related to the Delhi riots, in which a sessions court is hearing his bail application.
Metropolitan Magistrate Jitendra Pratap Singh of the Saket Courts has now posted the matter for further hearing on March 15.
The application mentions an event organised by the Hindu Yuva Vahini at Govindpuri Metro Station on December 19, 2021 in which the accused was âseen administering an oathâ to a group of people to âdie for and killâ to make India a âHindu Rashtraâ or a âHindu Nationâ.
The application sought the registration of FIR against Chavhanke for âgiving speeches and making statements that are communal, divisive, incendiary and amount to hate speeches, with the knowledge that such incendiary remarks would have the propensity to stoke tensions inter se persons belonging to certain communities, and also would directly instigate violenceâ.
The application stated that Chavhankeâs statement âis a clear threat to use force and violence against the minorities in order to make India a Hindu Rashtra (Hindu Nation)â.
It also stated that soon after the event, Chavhanke was further seen popularising a Hindi hashtag called âEk hi Sapna Hindu Rashtraâ from his Twitter handle which translates into âone dream Hindu nationâ.
âThat such tweets by the accused are a direct assault on the core values of the Constitution of this country, of secularism, equality and fraternity and intents to create enmity in the name of religion,â the application stated.
Â
The application also stated that âno preliminary inquiry is required in the present case as the inflammatory, communal and hate speeches were made by the accused persons during public events and the videos of the same are in the public domainâ.
It stated that it was imperative that action be taken against Chavhanke holding him responsible for the inflammatory statements and to prevent any act of incidents of violence.
Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram