Bikram Majithia granted 4 more weeks to amend plea in DA case, Punjab & Haryana HC adjourns matter again

The SAD leader first approached the high court on July 3, seeking relief against his “illegal arrest and remand.” On that day, his lawyers sought a day’s adjournment to place additional documents on record. When the case was taken up on July 4, they withdrew the plea and filed a fresh petition, which came up on July 8.

In the hearing on July 8, Majithia’s counsel asked for three more weeks, saying that they needed time to bring on record the remand orders and additional material, leading the court to list the matter for July 29.

At Tuesday’s hearing, Majithia’s lawyers sought another four weeks to further amend and update the petition, which Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya allowed, fixing the next hearing for August 26.

In his petition, Majithia has alleged that he was picked up from his Amritsar home around 9 am on June 25 and kept in custody for over two hours before his formal arrest at 11.20 am, in breach of his constitutional and statutory rights. He contended that this amounts to illegal detention under Article 22(2) of the Constitution and Section 187 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (formerly Section 167 CrPC).

The plea also challenges the June 26 remand order as “manifestly perverse and non-speaking,” alleging that the magistrate ignored mandatory requirements such as examining the case diary and recording judicial satisfaction. Majithia’s counsel further argued that the order disregarded a March 4, 2025, Supreme Court directive rejecting custodial interrogation and instead required him to cooperate with the Special Investigation Team (SIT) — directions he claim to have fully complied with.

Despite this, the state allegedly obtained a fresh remand by “concealing facts and misrepresenting urgency” to extract a confession, violating Article 20(3) of the Constitution (right against self-incrimination), it was alleged. Terming his arrest and remand a “gross violation” of Articles 14, 20, and 21, Majithia sought quashing of the remand order and safeguards against what he said was further abuse of process.

The petition was filed through advocates Sartej Singh Narula, Damanbir Singh Sobti, Arshdeep Singh Cheema, Arshdeep Singh Kler, and Sultan Singh Sangha.