Journalism of Courage
Advertisement
Premium

Gujarat riots case: Justice Samir Dave recuses from hearing Teesta Setalvad’s plea to quash FIR

In November last year, Justice Samir Dave had recused himself from hearing Teesta Setalvad’s bail application in the case.

teesta setalvad, gujarat riots, gujaratJustice Sameer Dave and activist Teesta Setalvad (Photo credits: CDJ Law Journal/PTI)
Listen to this article Your browser does not support the audio element.

Justice Samir Dave of the Gujarat High Court on Thursday recused himself from taking up Mumbai-based activist Teesta Setalvad’s petition seeking quashing of the FIR against her for allegedly fabricating evidence in relation to the 2002 Gujarat riot cases.

When advocate Somnath Vatsa mentioned the matter for hearing before Justice Dave’s court, where the matter was listed, Justice Dave said, “Not before me”. The matter will now require the Gujarat High Court Chief Justice’s order to be placed before an appropriate court.

Earlier in November last year, Justice Dave had also recused himself from hearing Setalvad’s bail application in the case.

Setalvad is facing charges under sections 468 (forgery for purpose of cheating), 469 (forgery), 471 (using as genuine a forged document or electronic record), 194 (giving or fabricating false evidence with intent to procure conviction of capital offence), 211 (false charge of offence made with intent to injure), 218 (public servant framing incorrect record or writing with intent to save person from punishment or property from forfeiture) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code.

The FIR was lodged by the Detection of Crime Branch police station in Ahmedabad. As per the chargesheet in the case, Setalvad had hatched a conspiracy to institute a false case with false evidence, allegedly in a bid to implicate then chief minister (now PM) Narendra Modi, higher officials of the state government and top leaders of the BJP for the large-scale deaths in the 2002 communal riots.

Earlier, on July 19, the Supreme Court had granted Setalvad relief by allowing her bail. A day later, an Ahmedabad court had refused to discharge Setalvad from the charges, saying that “there is prima facie evidence” against her to frame the charges.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
  • Teesta Setalvad
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Tavleen Singh writesWhy Sycophants cause more harm than good
X