Journalism of Courage
Advertisement
Premium

Dr Atul Chag’s suicide: Family concedes contempt petition not maintainable before Gujarat HC

Dr Atul Chag’s son Hitarth had moved a contempt petition, submitting that the police had not registered an FIR despite a Supreme Court judgment providing a mandate to do so.

Outside Dr Atul Chag’s hospital in Veraval. (Express photo by Ravi Khakhar)Outside Dr Atul Chag’s hospital in Veraval. (Express photo by Ravi Khakhar)
Listen to this article Your browser does not support the audio element.

A day after the state submitted before the Gujarat High Court that it will register an FIR in Dr Atul Chag’s suicide case, his son Hitarth, through his lawyers on Wednesday, conceded before the court that the petitioner’s contempt petition is not maintainable before the court. The court has reserved the matter for orders on April 25 now.

Dr Chag, who had a hospital in Veraval town in Gir Somnath, died by suicide on February 12. A purported suicide note was recovered from his residence in which he had allegedly blamed BJP MP from Junagadh Rajesh Chudasama and his father Naran Chudasama for compelling him to take the extreme step.

The contempt petition moved by Hitarth had submitted that the police officials have not registered an FIR to date despite the mandate provided for in the Supreme Court judgment of Lalita Kumari versus Government of Uttar Pradesh and others, thus violating the guidelines prescribed therein. Among those made respondent parties in the petition are Veraval Police Inspector Sunil Ishrani, Deputy Superintendent of Police at Veraval V R Khengar, Superintendent of Police at Gir Somnath Manoharsinh Jadeja and DIG Mayanksinh Chavda.

The issue of non-maintainability of the petition by Dr Chag’s son was raised by the investigating officer in the case and police inspector Ishrani, through his advocate senior counsel Jal Unwalla.

Senior advocate Yogesh Lakhani, representing the petitioner, submitted before the bench of Justices A J Shastri and J C Doshi on Wednesday that after referring to several prior high court and Supreme Court judgments “for defiance and contravention of direction issued by SC, contempt jurisdiction of HC cannot be exercised”. However, Lakhani argued that their case be considered under Article 141 of the Constitution of India which holds that law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all courts within the territory of India.

The division bench, which on Tuesday had indicated that a prima facie case is made out where FIR could have and should have been registered, had inquired from the public prosecutor if the state will register an FIR in the case, to which the state had submitted it will. The bench on Wednesday remarked that its preliminary observation is now subject to the maintainability of the petition, and if the petition is not maintainable, it will not be in a position to issue any directions.

The court reserved the matter for orders on April 25.

From the homepage

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
  • Gujarat
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Big PictureJustice denied, justice delivered: Nithari accused Koli's long walk to freedom
X