Journalism of Courage
Advertisement
Premium

US suspends $1-billion in aid to Pakistan, asks it to act on terror groups at home first

The Pakistani's have clearly indicated that they are unhappy with the public rhetoric of the Trump administration.

5 min read
Heather NauertState Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert speaks during a briefing at the State Department in Washington, Wednesday, Aug. 9, 2017. The State Department says President Donald Trump is "on the same page" with the rest of U.S. government with his fiery threat to North Korea. Nauert said the White House, State Department and Pentagon are all in agreement. She says the world, too, is speaking with once voice. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

FOUR DAYS after President Donald Trump accused Pakistan of “lies and deceit”, and providing a “safe haven” to terrorists, the US administration Friday suspended over $1.15 billion in security aid and military equipment to Islamabad for not acting against the Afghan Taliban and the Haqqani terror network.

The amount includes $255 million in Foreign Military Funding (FMF) for the fiscal year 2016 as mandated by the US Congress. The US Department of Defense has also suspended $900 million in Coalition Support Funds (CSF) to Pakistan for the fiscal year 2017 and other unspent money in aid from previous fiscal years.

“Today we can confirm that we are suspending national security assistance only, to Pakistan at this time until the Pakistani government takes decisive action against groups, including the Afghan Taliban and the Haqqani Network,” US State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert told reporters in Washington DC.

“We consider them (terror groups) to be destabilising the region and also targeting US personnel. The US will suspend that kind of security assistance to Pakistan,” she said.

The US, she said, will not be delivering military equipment or transferring security related funds to Pakistan unless it is required by law.

Sources in Washington DC told The Indian Express that the freeze was “temporary” and could be lifted if Pakistan “changed its ways”.

Indian government sources described the US move as a “positive development” and said that other global powers, too, should reconsider aid and assistance to Pakistan. However, they pointed out, China has emerged as a larger provider of aid to Pakistan in recent years than the US.

Story continues below this ad

Reacting to the Trump administration’s move, Pakistan said, “We are engaged with the US Administration on the issue of security cooperation and await further details.” The impact of the US decision on pursuit of common objectives is also likely to emerge more clearly in due course of time, Pakistan’s Foreign Office said in a statement in Islamabad.

It said that Pakistan believed that its cooperation with US in fighting terrorism directly served US national security interests as well as the larger interests of the international community. Through major counter-terrorism operations, Pakistan has cleared all these areas resulting in elimination of organised terrorist presence, the statement said.

The US move reportedly capped considerable debate within the administration after the Pentagon warned the State Department that Rawalpindi could retaliate by denying access to routes in Pakistan that the US uses to supply about 14,000 American troops in Afghanistan.

According to the Congressional Research Service (CRS), US aid to Pakistan in the 2016 financial year was $1.1 billion, and $1.6 billion the year before. US civilian and military assistance for Pakistan has dropped from an average of over $2.2 billion a year during the period immediately after the 9/11 terror attacks to an estimated $526 million in 2017.

Story continues below this ad

On January 1, posting his first tweet of 2018, Trump wrote: “The United States has foolishly given Pakistan more than 33 billion dollars in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us nothing but lies & deceit, thinking of our leaders as fools. They give safe haven to the terrorists we hunt in Afghanistan, with little help. No more!”

Nauert said that Defence secretary James Mattis and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson had travelled to Pakistan in recent months to deliver tough message to the country’s leadership. “They may say it’s a surprise, but what is no surprise is that the President has expressed his concerns, Secretary Tillerson has expressed his concerns, as has Secretary Mattis, and I imagine many other government officials having those conversations with Pakistan,” Nauert said.

The money that has been suspended at this time does not mean that it will be withheld forever, she said. “Pakistan has the ability to get this money back, in the future, but they have to take decisive action. They have to take decisive steps,” said Nauert.

“People have long asked, why don’t you do more about Pakistan, and I think this sort of answers that question,” she said. “They understand that, but still they aren’t taking the steps that they need to take in order to fight terrorism,” she said.

Story continues below this ad

The spokesperson, however, made clear that the action had nothing to do with Pakistan not taking action against the Mumbai terror attack mastermind and JuD chief Hafiz Saeed.

The United States has in the past frozen military aid without forcing a change in Pakistan’s policies. In July 2011, two months after US Seal Team Six killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan, the Obama administration suspended about $800 million in aid. But, it did not lead to any tangible change in behaviour, besides piecemeal changes.

(With PTI/ Washington)

Shubhajit Roy, Diplomatic Editor at The Indian Express, has been a journalist for more than 25 years now. Roy joined The Indian Express in October 2003 and has been reporting on foreign affairs for more than 17 years now. Based in Delhi, he has also led the National government and political bureau at The Indian Express in Delhi — a team of reporters who cover the national government and politics for the newspaper. He has got the Ramnath Goenka Journalism award for Excellence in Journalism ‘2016. He got this award for his coverage of the Holey Bakery attack in Dhaka and its aftermath. He also got the IIMCAA Award for the Journalist of the Year, 2022, (Jury’s special mention) for his coverage of the fall of Kabul in August 2021 — he was one of the few Indian journalists in Kabul and the only mainstream newspaper to have covered the Taliban’s capture of power in mid-August, 2021. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
  • Pakistan
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
The Big PictureBig protein flex: India's diet is getting a makeover, but are we doing it right?
X