
 •                                                 Rajeev               Shukla observes that much hue and cry is made over MPs’ salaries               every time enhancements are made (‘Notional perks’, Frontfoot,               IE, August 6). Yes, the basic salary of Rs 12,0000 is very small               compared to the salary of an under-secretary. But no official gets               a princely amount as sitting fees for working in his own workplace.               No officer gets a corpus to distribute which goes by the name of               constituency allowance. No officer gets a pension if his service               is only for two years!
               
— T.S. Rao Singapore
•               Of the 500-odd MPs we have, Shukla has been able to list only two               names of honest MPs. I can list several names — without doing               background research — who would make even a don feel inadequate!               When we see people like Laloo Prasad Yadav and George Fernandes               continuing as ministers, people like Shahabuddin ensuring that honest               officers are not allowed to do their jobs, how do you expect us               to have faith in our MPs?
               
— Sudhir Sharma Pathumthani
•               Please remember even a bank clerk has to have minimum qualifications               and experience for his job. Secondly, they are supposed to be full-time               professionals. So please don’t insult our professional working               class!
               
— Sudhakar Nair Delhi
•               If the salaries and perks of MPs are so low how come they want their               sons and other family members to become MPs?
               
— Kishore Gersappa Mumbai
Great judge
               
•               The respected justice, M. Katju, would have done a great service               if everyone in the legal profession (from lawyers to judges) takes               note of his insightful comments. Fali Nariman has helped us understand               the profoundity of Justice Katju’s legal comments (‘A               judge above contempt’, IE, August 5). It’s people of their               calibre who really protect the freedoms we enjoy. Justice Katju               has clarified the limits of judicial power and the dharma of a judge.               A brilliant analysis indeed, Mr Nariman.
               
— Gokul Kunnath Atlanta
•               The great Nariman still retains his courage (and perhaps he is one               of a fast dying out species!). The country cannot develop unless               people stand up for truth. The issue of corruption in the judiciary               is a burning issue. I wonder what happened to the idea of a national               judicial commission?
               
— Arvind Kumar Patna
Team India
               
•               Both Ian Chappel and Rahul Dravid should have a close look at Team               India and also Team Sri Lanka. Jayasuriya, despite carrying the               burden of opening the innings, comes on to bowl his flat Darren               Lehman-like shooters to keep the scoring down and also pick up wickets,               Dilshan is more than useful as a slow bowler and Russel Arnold,               too, can pitch in on slow turners. Sri Lankan captains use them               well and don’t dismiss them as half bowlers. Take Team India.               Kaif was a good office while playing for the under-19 team and he               is hardly used as a bowler, Laxman had bowled his offbreaks even               at the Ranji level and he is never called upon to improve his bowling               to take on some responsibility, Viru, of course, is getting his               chances while Yuvraj can develop into another Jayasuriya! Sourav               Ganguly’s bowling days are over, as for his batting, the fuel               in the tank seems to be fast depleting and as for fielding, he himself               knows maharajas cannot run!
               
— Neel Patri New Delhi