Journalism of Courage
Advertisement
Premium

In Chhattisgarh park, Project Tiger left to Naxals

In Chhattisgarh’s Indravati National Park, nobody has time for the tigers. And you can’t blame them.Imagine a Tiger Reserve that n...

.

In Chhattisgarh’s Indravati National Park, nobody has time for the tigers. And you can’t blame them.

Imagine a Tiger Reserve that no forest guard has entered — not on their own, at any rate — in last three years. Imagine 56 revenue villages surviving virtually outside the government in a jungle where the People’s War Group (PWG) claims to run its own ‘‘government’’. Imagine a forest management that wanted to move the field director’s office to Raipur, more than 500 km from the National Park.

Now, consider these:

• Since 2002, says Field Director K Murugan, PWG has been clear: Forest staff is not welcome inside the Park. Coming after the director’s office was shifted 200 km away to Jagdalpur in 1996, after then CF P M Tiwari was beaten up by the Naxalites, nobody took the ban lightly

• The situation even prompted a move to denotify the Park till the state put its foot down. ‘‘The proposal has been put on hold. The Park will be orphaned if we denotify it now,’’ says Dr Rajesh Gopal, director, Project Tiger

• Villagers are unanimous that they have not seen any forest staff inside the Park for years. As such, they are supposed to inform the PWG if they spot an outsider

• Denied access, officials take solace from the complete stop to hunting and tree-felling inside Indravati following a Naxal ban a few years ago. Even the month-long annual hunting fest of the local tribals — paradh — has been under check. ‘‘Thanks to the PWG ban, animals and the jungle are safe. We are happy that Naxals are doing our job,’’ says SDO S G Parulkar. There is no way to ascertain the tiger status before the Naxal ban

• The Naxalite threat notwithstanding, tiger census reports are filed every year. Parulkar claims 31 tigers were counted in the 2005 census, the highest since the Park came under Project Tiger in 1984 with 38 tigers

Story continues below this ad

Lakhshminath Nag is the lone beat guard manning the chowki at Farsegarh, a village on the Park boundary. He says others posted there avoid staying overnight and only make short visits. Nag sometimes ventures inside the Park on foot. ‘‘That’s the best I can do,’’ he says. He hasn’t forgotten how badly he was beaten up inside the forest by the Naxals before he sought this ‘‘safer’’ posting.

Mid-90s onwards, forest staff became wary of serving at Indravati and the department employed locals who have no choice as they can’t leave their villages.

Says Field Director K Murugan who took charge a few months back: ‘‘It’s a conflict situation. Naxalites don’t allow road maintenance so the Park is inaccessible by car. Our men try to go in on two-wheelers and foot. Our chowkis inside have been dismantled. But it’s wrong to say there is no access. It is limited but our staff does go in…Villagers may not see us as we avoid them unless necessary. There is no funds problem. No major vacancies either.’’

But admits Dr Rajesh Gopal, Director, Project Tiger: ‘‘Indravati is not in good shape. I had to stop the move to shift the HQ to Raipur by stopping funds. But Murugan is trying to improve the situation.’’

Story continues below this ad

But how are PT funds spent in the absence of proper access to the Park? While villagers allege corruption — ‘‘forest officials spend it on paper’’ — Murugan laughs it off: ‘‘What corruption? We do some developmental work that the Naxalites don’t object to. Anyway the fund is too small. So spending it is not a problem.’’

Valmik Thapar, member of Central Empowered Committee formed by the SC, is not impressed: ‘‘Indravati is a failure. It is understood that all project Parks can’t succeed. But why can’t they be honest and declare it a failure? If tigers are safe with Naxals, let Project Tiger spend that money elsewhere.’’

‘‘Naxalite ban on hunting is great logic,’’ says P K Sen, ex-director, Project Tiger, and chief of WWF Tiger Programme, ‘‘but if villagers can’t flout PWG ban on hunting, do you think forest staff would defy Naxals and enter the Park to conduct tiger census? Then, how do these numbers come up every year?’’

Jay Mazoomdaar is an investigative reporter focused on offshore finance, equitable growth, natural resources management and biodiversity conservation. Over two decades, his work has been recognised by the International Press Institute, the Ramnath Goenka Foundation, the Commonwealth Press Union, the Prem Bhatia Memorial Trust, the Asian College of Journalism etc. Mazoomdaar’s major investigations include the extirpation of tigers in Sariska, global offshore probes such as Panama Papers, Robert Vadra’s land deals in Rajasthan, India’s dubious forest cover data, Vyapam deaths in Madhya Pradesh, mega projects flouting clearance conditions, Nitin Gadkari’s link to e-rickshaws, India shifting stand on ivory ban to fly in African cheetahs, the loss of indigenous cow breeds, the hydel rush in Arunachal Pradesh, land mafias inside Corbett, the JDY financial inclusion scheme, an iron ore heist in Odisha, highways expansion through the Kanha-Pench landscape etc. ... Read More

Tags:
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Muttaqi in IndiaWhy New Delhi is increasing engagement with Afghanistan's Taliban
X