Tech integration must not be at cost of right to be heard: Supreme Court judge
Justice Surya Kant was speaking at the Supreme Court of Kenya recently on “Optimising Service Delivery in the Judiciary: Best Practices, Challenges and Innovation”.
Regarding judicial independence, Justice Kant said that “too is the bedrock of constitutional democracy”, adding that “it must be fortified by unwavering integrity. The fight against corruption is not just a legal battle, it is a fight for the very soul of justice.”
Advertisement
The true essence of justice is not confined to the written judgment, it lives in the experience of those who seek it, Supreme Court judge Justice Surya Kant said and cautioned that integration of tech must not be at the cost of the right to be heard.
Justice Surya Kant was speaking at the Supreme Court of Kenya recently on “Optimising Service Delivery in the Judiciary: Best Practices, Challenges and Innovation”.
You have exhausted your monthly limit of free stories.
Read more stories for free with an Express account.
Referring to how integration of technology had aided the ease of dispensing justice, Justice Kant cautioned that this must not be at the cost of the right to be heard. “Swift justice must not become hurried justice. The delicate balance between efficiency and fairness remains the hallmark of a truly just legal system,” he said.
Justice Kant said that “the march towards digitisation holds immense promise, but it also risks creating a two-tier justice system. Those without access to technology must not become victims of digital exclusion.”
“The greatest strength of the judiciary lies in the confidence it commands from the people”, Justice Kant said, adding that “this trust is not built overnight but is forged through consistent service, unwavering integrity, and a steadfast commitment to placing people at the heart of the justice delivery system”.
He said, “Indian judiciary has long been a beacon of constitutional values and democratic resilience. From landmark judgments like Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala, which enshrined the Basic Structure doctrine, to the transformative strides in digitization under the e-Courts Project, India’s judicial system has continuously evolved to meet the aspirations of its citizens.”
Justice Kant said that “our discourse today is not merely about service delivery, but it is about justice transformation. We stand at the crossroads of history, where the weight of tradition must give way to the winds of innovation.”
Story continues below this ad
Complementing the Kenyan judiciary for the strides made in adoption of technology, Justice Kant said similarly, the journey of the Indian judiciary is a testament to the philosophy that “justice is not a privilege, but a right”, and one that must be delivered without delay, without discrimination, and without dilution.
On transparency, he said that it “is the currency of trust in a democratic society. The publication of judgments, digitization of court records, and adoption of Open Data Initiatives empower citizens to hold the judiciary accountable. Just as sunlight is the best disinfectant, transparency serves as the strongest safeguard against opacity and suspicion.”
Regarding judicial independence, Justice Kant said that “too is the bedrock of constitutional democracy”, adding that “it must be fortified by unwavering integrity. The fight against corruption is not just a legal battle, it is a fight for the very soul of justice.”
Justice Kant said that as the Indian and Kenyan judiciaries chart the collaborative course, “we must remember that the judiciary does not serve files, it serves human lives. Every decision, every reform, every innovation must place the citizen at the heart of our systems.”
Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry.
He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More